Answer:
Hi
Serving: (a) In general. The process, which does not include a subpoena under Rule 4 or a subpoena under Rule 45, must be delivered by a United States marshal or a marshal deputy or by a person specially designated for that purpose, within the territorial limits of the state where the district court is located and, if authorized by federal statute, beyond those limits.
(b) Compliance with orders: Commitment of civil contempt. An order that commits a person for civil contempt of a decree can be delivered and executed in any district. Any other order in a civil contempt process can be delivered only in the state where the issuing court is located or in another place in the United States within 100 miles of where the order was issued.
Summons: (1) Content. A subpoena must: (A) name of the court and the parties; (B) be directed to the accused; (C) indicate the name and address of the plaintiff's lawyer or, if not indicated, of the plaintiff; (D) indicate the time within which the accused must appear and defend himself; (E) notify the defendant that the lack of appearance and defense may result in a default trial against the defendant for the compensation required in the complaint; (F) must be signed by the secretary; (G) that bears the seal of the court.
Subpoena: (a) In general. (1) Form and content. (A) Requirements: in general. Each citation must: (i) indicate the court from which it issued; (ii) indicate the title of the action and its civil action number; (iii) order each person to be told to do a specific time and place: attend and testify; produce designated documents, electronically stored information or tangible things in possession, custody or control of that person; or allow the inspection of premises; and (iv) establish the text of Rule 45 (d)
Consult the standard in https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp
Explanation:
Answer:
Criminal law is the most ancient branch of the law. Many wise observers have tried to define and explain it, but the explanations often include many complex and subtle distinctions. A traditional criminal law course would include a lot of discussions on criminal intent, the nature of criminal versus civil responsibility, and the constitutional rights accorded the accused. But in this chapter, we will consider only the most basic aspects of intent, responsibility, and constitutional rights.
Unlike civil actions, where plaintiffs seek compensation or other remedies for themselves, crimes involve “the state” (the federal government, a state government, or some subunit of state government). This is because crimes involve some “harm to society” and not just harm to certain individuals. But “harm to society” is not always evident in the act itself. For example, two friends of yours at a party argue, take the argument outside, and blows are struck; one has a bloody nose and immediately goes home. The crimes of assault and battery have been committed, even though no one else knows about the fight and the friends later make up. By contrast, suppose a major corporation publicly announces that it is closing operations in your community and moving operations to Southeast Asia. There is plenty of harm to society as the plant closes down and no new jobs take the place of the company’s jobs. Although the effects on society are greater in the second example, only the first example is a crime.
Crimes are generally defined by legislatures, in statutes; the statutes describe in general terms the nature of the conduct they wish to criminalize. For government punishment to be fair, citizens must have clear notice of what is criminally prohibited. Ex post facto laws—laws created “after the fact” to punish an act that was legal at the time—are expressly prohibited by the US Constitution. Overly vague statutes can also be struck down by courts under a constitutional doctrine known as “void for vagueness.”
In order for a plaintiff to establish that they have the standing to sue, they need to allege a personal stake in the resolution of the controversy.
<h3>When can a plaintiff sue?</h3>
For a plaintiff to be able to sue a defendant, they need to show the courts that they will be personally affected by the case.
This is to ensure that people and companies are not sued haphazardly by plaintiffs for one reason or the other because the legal process can be quite expensive.
Find out more on the right to sue at brainly.com/question/15011106.
#SPJ1
