Answer:
Consider the following explanations
Explanation:
a. The whole argument is based on the controlling of different factors such as age, education and occupation among males and females. Now, this is very subjective how they have controlled occupation. For e.g. – Which all occupation they have considered for as stressful job, which all jobs they have considered as physical tiring jobs. Working in a refinery may be physical tiring job but then working in IT Company can also be tiring.
Therefore since there are lot of factors at play apart the one considered to calculate ratio’s we can say that these differential percentage points can always be more than or less than of what presented in question.
b. The same logic has to be applied to (b) as well. When we say that discrimination account for less than 8 percent of differential we implied to say that occupation nature may have more than 12 percent of differential. Now, if you use above logic and applied from occupation point of view.
The answer is diminish economic growth.
- The lack of property rights will produce difficulties in the daily lives of the people, and they will not be rectified unless the government intervenes with some property rights, because everyone would grab the property with power because the property rights are not there to claim the rights.
- Negative growth is defined as a drop in a company's revenues or earnings, or a drop in an economy's GDP in any quarter. Negative growth is characterized by declining wage growth and a decline of the money supply, and economists consider negative growth as a precursor to a future recession or depression.
- Economists usually believe that four variables drive economic development and growth: human resources, physical capital, natural resources, and technology.
Thus this is the meaning of diminish economic growth.
To learn more about economic growth, refer: brainly.com/question/18964806
#SPJ4
<span>You are paying 11% interest on a credit card balance of $2,000.
=> 2 000 * .11 = 220 dollars is the interest.
Next is to total or sum up the amount to be paid.
=> 2 000 + 220 = 2220 dollars
</span>
Answer:
a) DuPont analysis for Johnson International
2013: 0.059 x 2.11 x 1.75 = 0.2179 = 21.79%
2014: 0.058 x 2.18 x 1.75 = 0.2213 = 22.13%
2015: 0.049 x 2.34 x 1.85 = 0.2121 = 21.21%
b) DuPont analysis for industry averages
2013: 0.054 x 2.05 x 1.67 = 0.2121 = 21.21%
2014: 0.047 x 2.13 x 1.69 = 0.1692 = 16.92%
2015: 0.041 x 2.15 x 1.64 = 0.1446 = 14.46%
c) Johnson International's drivers follow the same tendency as the industry's average, e.g. net profit margin decreased in a similar manner, and total asset turnover increased also in a similar manner to the industry's average. The only driver that doesn't follow the industry's trend is financial leverage. While other companies in the same industry decreased their financial leverage, Johnson increased it. You should further analyze why this happened and what are the potential consequences.
Explanation:
The DuPont analysis is used to break down ROE into 3 different components and that way you can analyze whether a company's high ROE comes along with a high risk. The following formula is used to calculate ROE based on 3 different factors:
R
OE = net pro
fit margin x total assets turnover x financial leverage
