Tina has the right to sue the company that sold her the product arguing that it had been recalled as potentially dangerous to consumers and she should be compensated for the damages caused by the dryer.
<h3>What should Tina do?</h3>
Tina must seek help from the Federal Trade Commission, this institution is in charge of protecting consumers and promoting competition between companies.
Based on the foregoing, Tina can rely on this institution to sue the company that sold her the dryer because this product had been withdrawn from the market for being dangerous.
So the company that sold him the dryer was committing a crime for selling this object. Additionally, this company must compensate Tina for the damages caused by this product.
Learn more about consumer in: brainly.com/question/950909
Answer:
1. we already have laws
2. banning the use of guns is unconstitutional (2nd amendment)
3. it's not the gun itself but the person behind the gun
4. gun control has been proven to be unsuccessful (look at Australia's homicide rates with various weapons)
5. banning or limiting guns restricts our access to protection against other people, corrupt government, etc
Explanation:
for #3, more ppl stop school shootings, mass murders, etc. before they happen, but they never show up on the news bc it's not a good enough story. social media and even the news nowadays is super biased, never shows all of the facts, and exaggerates things, so don't believe everything you see on the internet.
Answer:
Yes he should go take a eye test
Explanation:
The court can do whatever the seem to deem well so they can ask him to got take a vision test so he doesn't have any problems with is eyes even though he crashed he may have night time eye problems
It's accurate to say this. An oral contract involving specifically produced items is enforceable in these circumstances without a written document under the UCC statute of frauds.
<h3>Can you enforce a verbal contract?</h3>
As long as the fundamental components of a contract—an offer, an acceptance, a transfer of consideration, and an agreement on the terms of the contract—are present, oral agreements will typically be upheld in court. An oral contract can be enforced even if non-essential conditions have not been agreed upon.
<h3>Is an oral agreement still binding?</h3>
A handshake agreement may nevertheless qualify as a contract and be upheld by a court, albeit frequently with difficulty. However, verbal agreements might leave room for ambiguity regarding the rights and obligations of each participant. If you don't have anything on a paper outlining what you both agreed to accomplish, a disagreement could occur.
Learn more about oral contract: brainly.com/question/15104947
#SPJ13
This is true :) Variable rainbow text is used on the date of birth
