All categories

3 years ago

Can someone please help me with this question??

Mathematics

2 answers:

Vlad1618 [11]3 years ago

6 0

Y= 2 cause -2 x -4 = 8. And the only way to get to 8 from 6 is by adding 2. Hope this is helpful.

DENIUS [597]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

y+6 = -2(x-4)

Step-by-step explanation:

Point slope form is given by

(y-y1) = m(x-x1) where m is the slope and (x1,y1) is a point on the line

(y - -6) = -2( x-4)

y+6 = -2(x-4)

You might be interested in

Answer this for me please.

Citrus2011 [14]

The answer is x=-5 and x=1
Explanation: you just look where the line crosses the x axis which is left to right

7 0

2 years ago

What’s the answer????

Bond [772]

First option. The inequality can be split into two separate inequalities.

6 0

2 years ago

The net worthw(t) of a company is growing at a rate of′(t) = 2000−121t2dollarsper year, wheretis in years since 1990.(a) If the

stiv31 [10]

Answer:

The worth of the company in 2000 is $56,000.

Step-by-step explanation:

The growth rate of the company is:

$f'(t)=2000-12t^{2}$

To determine the worth of the company in 2000, first compute the change in the net worth during the period 1990 (<em>t</em> = 0) to 2000 (<em>t</em> = 10) as follows:

$\int\limits^{10}_{0} {2000-12t^{2}} \, dt =\int\limits^{10}_{0} {2000} \, dt-12\int\limits^{10}_{0} {t^{2}} \, dt=2000 |t|^{10}_{0}-12|\frac{t^{3}}{3}|^{10}_{0}\\=(2000\times10)-(4\times10^{3})\\=20000-4000\\=16000$

The increase in the company's net worth from 1990 to 2000 is $16,000.

If the company's worth was $40,000 in 1990 then the worth of the company in 2000 is:

Worth in 2000 = Worth in 1990 + Net increase in company's worth

$=40000+16000\\=56000$

Thus, the worth of the company in 2000 is $56,000.

4 0

3 years ago

A toaster oven costing $130 offers an extended warranty for 25% of the purchase price.

tester [92]

I assume you want the total cost of the toaster and the warranty the total is $162.50

3 0

3 years ago

Which of the sets of ordered pairs represents a function?

Marrrta [24]

Answer:

Set A

Step-by-step explanation:

By definition "a function may NOT have two y-values assigned to the same x-value, [but] it may have two x-values assigned to the same y-value."(https://mathbitsnotebook.com/Algebra1/Functions/FNFuncBasics.html)

Set A has follows this set of rules while Set B does not. Also if we graph it, Set B does not pass the vertical line test. (Learn about the vertical line test in the link below).

http://www.coolmath.com/algebra/15-functions/03-vertical-line-test-01

7 0

3 years ago