All categories

2 years ago

Fill in the blanks Minerals can be extracted by________

Social Studies

2 answers:

Oksi-84 [34.3K]2 years ago

7 0

Answer:

mining

Explanation:

Once a mineral deposit has been found it has to be extracted from the ground to access the valuable minerals it contains. This can be done by opencast quarrying or underground mining. Certain minerals can also be extracted by pumping.

madam [21]2 years ago

3 0

This can be done by opencast quarrying or underground mining. Certain minerals can also be extracted by pumping.

You might be interested in

Explain how sin worked through the law.

Alenkinab [10]

Answer:

Well what is the question exactly? Sin is breaking God's commandment. One law from God is not killing and the law also says to not kill so maybe thats the answer I hope your looking for.

6 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

which present day country or group of countries did the huang he (yellow river) civlization start in?

serious [3.7K]

Answer: The Huang He (Yellow River) Valley is the birthplace of the Chinese Civilization. The Yellow River is the second largest river in China and one of the longest river systems in the world. (hope this helps!)

6 0

2 years ago

The social psychologist who is best known for his controversial series of studies investigating obedience to authority is:

Roman55 [17]

Answer: Stanley Milgram

Explanation: As Stanley Milgram himself stated, the essence of obedience to authority is when a person begins to perceive himself as a tool to fulfil the wishes of the authority, not his own wishes, so he sees all his actions and consequences of these actions as a result of the action of authority, not as a result of his will and responsibility. Milgram based his experiment on the conflict that arises between the state of obedience and the conscience of a person who subordinated to authority. The essence of the experiment concerned the responsibility of those who committed genocide during WWII, who claimed to have been merely obedient, i.e executing the orders of superiors, and based their defense on this claim. This begs the question of whether or not they were complicit in the genocide.

The experiment was performed with pairs of participants where one was a "student" and the other was a "teacher", and where the student was connected to an electroshock electrode. Each time a student would give a wrong answer, the teacher would activate electricity through the electrodes and the student would experience an electric shock. With each wrong answer, the teacher would increase the level of electric shock. There are also some moderation in the experiment, such as a student would make a mistake on purpose, etc.

The conclusion is that ordinary people are generally willing to kill people, even if they are innocent in order to execute the orders of superiors, recognised as authority. It is considered that when it comes to authority, all its orders are justified and legal. So it is moral and proper to follow the orders of authority, whatever it may be.

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Six-year-old Corey is a witness to a crime, and he has been asked to view a lineup. Unfortunately, the true perpetrator is not i

Leni [432]

Answer:

Would be more likely to make a false positive error by identify an innocent person

Explanation:

Six-year-old Corey is a witness to a crime, and he has been asked to view a lineup. Unfortunately, the true perpetrator is not in the lineup. Researchers would predict that Corey,Would be more likely to make a false positive error by identify an innocent person by choosing the wrong person as compare to an adults due to his age and because the true perpetrator is not in the lineup despite the fact that he is the witness to the crime.

7 0

3 years ago

Jimmy sells an old station wagon to Mary and tells her that it is in excellent condition. He did not bother to verify the statem

nevsk [136]

Answer:

Negligent Misrepresentation

Explanation:

In contract law jurisdictions, a misrepresentation is a term that describes an untrue or misleading statement of fact, made by a party to a contract during negotiations, which affects the decision of the other party to a contract, that is, making other party agree to a contract.

There are three types of Misrepresentation, and they are:

1. Innocent Misrepresentation: a situation in which a misrepresentation made by party who had tenable grounds for believing that his false statement was true.

2. Negligent Misrepresentation: in situation in which a false statement is made to get another party to agree to the terms of a contract, when the party who made the statement had a duty to know.

3. Fraudulent Misrepresentation: an intentional false statement that is used to trick another party into an agreement.

Also, it is to be noted, that the misled party can seek for rescission of the contract, (party going to stages where they are before entering into contract) based on Misrepresentation and sometimes can be awarded damages as well.

Hence, in this case, since Jimmy did not bother to verify the statement of the previous owner that the car was making strange noises, before selling the old station wagon to Mary, which is considered as Negligent Misrepresentation. Therefore, under these circumstances, Mary could best contest the agreement on the grounds of Negligent Misrepresentation

5 0

3 years ago

Fill in the blanks Minerals can be extracted by________​

Fill in the blanks Minerals can be extracted by________