I think it would be coupon, comparative shopping, and mail-in rebate
hope this helps
This is a case in which apparently students can appeal to the fulfillment of the First Amendment that states the Freedom of Speech but I think that we have to remember that in any case our rights finish when we interfere with other peoples's rights.
I believe that schools, teachers and parents must get an agreement about what is good and bad for students because they are not mature enough to decide by themselves.
In the case Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier the supreme court rules in favor of the school board and make the difference between a private forum and a public forum stating that a school is a private forum.
Imagine that students were allowed to do whatever they want and present whatever play they wish then the school would have no rules and when a place has no rules it becomes jungle law
Answer: Positive reinforcement
Explanation:
Positive reinforcement is seen as rewarding an individual for their contribution in a bid to see them improve more. Justin reward to do more for the organization is seen as Positive reinforcement.
Explanation:
Through our work with companies across different industries, we found about 10 to 20 percent of the new product and services succeed that is by our definitions they remain in the market generating profit to the company.
<u>There are ten reasons why a new product fails:
</u>
- Marketers assess the market climate inadequately
- The wrong group was targeted
- A weak positioning strategy was used
- A less than the optimal configuration of attributes and benefits were selected
- A questionable pricing strategy was implemented
- The ad campaign generated
- Cannibalization depressed corporate profits
- Over-optimization about the marketing plan
- Poor implementation of the marketing plan
- The product pronounced dead and buried too soon.
