Answer: The British
Explanation:
Many Native American tribes fought in the Revolutionary War. The majority of these tribes fought for the British but a few fought for the Americans. Many of these tribes tried to remain neutral in the early phase of the war but when some of them came under attack by American militia, they decided to join the British.
Answer:
a. of the letters the settlers wrote to relatives back in Spain.
Explanation:
San Antonio de Bexar was a historical fort that was built by the Spanish in what is now present-day San Antonio, Texas, US. This place became one of the earliest places of settlement in which the Spanish people came to enter into the American soil, through the process of assimilation and colonial settlement.
In<u> 1675, an expedition consisting of Fray Juan Larios, Fernando del Bosque, Fray Francisco Hidalgo, and Fray Antonio de Olivares </u>was sent by the Spanish crown to look into the possibility of establishing new settlements. It was through this expedition that led to the discovery of San Antonio. <u>Historians were able to learn about the intention of the explorers about making it a permanent settlement from the letters sent to relatives about the need to send more people to the settlement</u>.
Thus, the correct answer is option a.
The correct answer is D because we can see that they affect both classes.
1.Research:Explore the websites provided to gather information on two landmark Supreme Court cases in order to compare the arguments for and against judicial restraint and judicial activism.
2.Write:Write an essay that compares and contrasts judicial activism and judicial restraint and presents your opinion on the debate surrounding these two philosophies.To get the best grade possible, follow the instructions in the assignment closely and answer all the questions completely. This assignment is worth 20 points.Use the provided websites to conduct research and answer the questions below. Your research will be critical to gathering the information necessary to write your essay. This section is worth 8 points.
1. Explain judicial restraint and the kinds of situations when it often comes into play. (1 point)Judicial restraint is where the judge limits the exercise of their own power and it comes into play when thejudge defers the issue to an elected official in the legislative or executive branches.
2. Explain judicial activism and the kinds of situations when it often comes into play. (1 point)Judicial activism is where the judge decides based on his/her opinion of what is best. These kinds of situations often occur when the judge tries to protect individual interests.
Info icon Subscribe to view the full document.
Subscribe to Unlock Right Arrow Icon
3. Explain the main arguments for and against judicial restraint. (1 point)For judicial restraintAgainst judicial restraintThe Constitution can only be interpreted by strict constructionist approachThe Constitution or laws made by legislature can be bague and be interpreted in different ways.
Answer: the answer is d) 1.3 animal kingdom
Explanation:
