Answer:
$65 per unit
Explanation:
For computing the cost per unit first we have to determine the cost of goods manufactured which is shown below:
Cost of goods manufactured = Opening work in process + direct material cost + direct labor cost + manufacturing overhead cost - ending work in process
= $10,000 + $12,000 + $6,000 + $4,000 - $6,000
= $26,000
And, there is a production of 400 MP3 players
So, the cost per unit is
= $26,000 ÷ 400 MP3 players
= $65 per unit
Answer:
Rate of interest is 8.37%
Explanation:
Future Value = 
3,500 = 2750 
= 
= ![\sqrt[3]{(1+r)^{3}}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Csqrt%5B3%5D%7B%281%2Br%29%5E%7B3%7D%7D)
1.0837 = 1+r
r = 1.0837 - 1
r = 0.0837
r = 8.37%
Check:
3500 = 2750 
3500 = 3500
Answer:
The answer is d. 70,000
Explanation:
The common stock account has the balance of 37,500 while stated value of a common stock is $0.50 => Common stock issued is 37,500/0.5 = 75,000 shares.
The treasury stock account presents the balance of 5,000 common shares; which is the amount of common stocks hold by Walton Corporation through repurchase transaction which will decreased the number of stock outstanding.
Thus, the number of common shares outstanding = number of common shares issued - number of common shares in treasury stock account = 75,000 - 5,000 = 70,000 common shares.
Thus the answer is d. 70,000.
I feel like this is a trick question because it would not be that simple of a decision but if those were the only two things to consider then I guess it would be true. But in real life you would have to worry about employment costs, advertisement of the new store, who will manage each store when you are at the other store, etc. There would be so many more things going into that decision than just 450,000-400,000=50,000. But I would go with true.
Hope that helps.
The elements that would have to be in place for a contract to be unconscionable would be that
- They were under pressure
- They were misled
- They did not have the right information
<h3>What is meant by a contract?</h3>
This is the term that is used to refer to the fact that two people or more have agreed to do business with themselves.
In order to be a contract, one person would have to create a bargain and the other would be the one that would agree to the terms.
It is unconscionable at the time when the contract is done and the person or one of the parties is found not to have been able to make the contract agreement at their right frame of mind. In this case, the law has the power to protect this party.
Hence they would have to rule in his favor. Therefore to be unconscionable, a contract would have to have been misled, have been made under duress and without the adequate information.
Read more on contracts here:
brainly.com/question/5746834
#SPJ1