Answer:
A
Step-by-step explanation:
(X,Y) It's the point where the lines intersect
Answer:
7 to 3 is this answer
Step-by-step explanation:
if you noticed, with all the other ones they all have 3 : 7 in it. So by the process of elimination it's 7 to 3 that is different. I'll tell you why,
3 : 7, that is the ratio we have as an example. That's why it isn't the different one.
3 to 7, you say 3 : 7 as 3 to 7 to it still has the same ratio
3/7, this is how to type the fraction version of the ratio so it makes sense that it is the same one as 3 : 7.
7 to 3, if you haven't noticed yet, all of them has 3 : 7 as a counterpart. They are all the same but this one, this is 7 : 3 or 7 to 3. So with logic, this is the different ratio.
Answer:
See below
Step-by-step explanation:
The ratio of the secants is the same when set up as full length to external length.
Formula
MN/LN = QN/PN
Givens
LN = 22 + 14 = 36
MN = 14
PN = 32
QN = x
Solution
14/36 = x / (32) Multiply both sides by 32
14*32 / 36 = x Combine 14 and 32
448/36 = x Divide by 36 and switch
x = 12.4
Answers
PN (External) = 13 is the closest answer
Length LN = 36
Answer:
No.
Step-by-step explanation:
Sam is incorrect because if you look at the original problem, you'll see that he has missed the negative sign!
90 / 9 does equal 10, but 90 / -9 equals -10.
The only way to get a positive answer is if both the divisor and dividend are positive or if they are both negative.
Thus, the correct answer should be -10.
Answer:
(a) 
(b)
Step-by-step explanation:
