Answer:
exponential
Step-by-step explanation:
exponential functions will always have a horizontal asymptote
In year 10, the table says the population is 25,000
But if we plugged x = 10 into the equation Lucy got, then,
y = 600x + 25000
y = 600(10) + 25000
y = 6000 + 25000
y = 31000
Lucy's equation says that the population in year x = 10 should be y = 31000 instead of 25000. So this is one way to show that there is an error. The output from the equation isn't matching what the table shows.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given the equation that represents this order expressed as;
The number of tiles = 12b + 38 where;
b is the the number of bundles ordered
If a customer needs 150 tiles, the total number of bundles ordered can be gotten by simply substituting The number of tiles into the modeled equation and find the value of b. This is as shown below;
On substituting;
150 = 12b + 38
12b = 150 - 38
12b = 112
b = 112/12
b = 9.33
b ≈ 9 bundles
We need to round up the problem because the number of tiles can not be in fraction but as whole numbers.
Answer:
234.784 ~ 235
Step-by-step explanation:
One side = 210
other side = 105
a2+b2 = c2
210 ^2 + 105 ^2 = c2
55125 = c ^2
c = 
= 234.784 ~ 235
hope its right!!!
Answer:
0.0414 with an upper tailed test
Step-by-step explanation:
Claim: P1P1 = P2P2
The above is a null hypothesis
The alternative hypothesis for a two-tailed test would be:
P1P1 \=/ P2P2
Where "\=/" represents "not equal to".
Using a z-table or z-calculator, we derive the p-value (probability value) for the z-score 2.04
With an upper tailed test, the
2 × [probability that z>2.04] = 2[0.0207] = 0.0414
This is the p-value for the test statistic.
Focus is on the alternative hypothesis.
