Answer and Explanation:
I will go through each and every option explaining the reasons and what option would be the best:
The (a) part says 'difference in wages will eventually disappear since a haircut is a homogeneous good' - This is not true because even though it is an homogeneous product, some customers do have a strong preference for barbers who are not going bald. Therefore, they know their worth and they would want to capitalize on that and get paid just a bit more than bald barbers.
The (b) part says 'barbershops that hire barbers with hair will be able to charge a higher price for a haircut to those consumers who have a strong preference for barbers with hair'. - If the barbershop charges higher price for barbers that have hair then the customers will prefer bald barbers as the questions mentions that there is high competition and since it is an homogeneous, customers would be willing to save money and get their haircut from some other barber.
The (c) part says 'barbershops that hire bald barbers will always be much more profitable' - Not necessarily. The reason is that some customers have a strong preference for barbers who are not bald and therefore, that would help barbershops who have barbers with hair to be a bit more profitable as some additional customers would want their services.
The (d) part says 'barbershops that hire barbers with hair will always be much more profitable' - This is the best option and the reason for it is because some customers have a strong preference for barbers with hair and that would help the barbershop to earn more. They would have the customers who already indifferent to whoever cuts their hair and in addition to that, they would also have the customers who have their preference.
Hence the answer is D.
The answer is electronic monitoring.
In corporations, it is not uncommon to find this policy. What it means is that every single Internet activity that you choose to engage in while using the company’s electronic equipment and Internet connection would be recorded by the company. The purpose of this policy is to discourage employees from using company resources for personal gains.
Answer:
Cash receipt for the month of November is $600000
Explanation:
The receipt of the cash will be such that the sales made in a particular month will be calculated half in the month of sale and half in the next month. Thus, the cash receipt from the accounts receivables for the month of November will be,
Cash received from the October sales = 620000 * 0.5 = $310000
Cash received from the November sales = 580000 * 0.5 = $290000
Total cash receipt in the month of November will be,
Cash receipt - November = 310000 + 290000
Cash receipt - November = $600000
The available options are:
A. No contribution can be made because the woman does not have earned income
B. A contribution of up to $6,000 is permitted, but the contribution is not tax deductible.
C. A tax deductible contribution of up to $7,000 is permitted
D. A tax deductible contribution of up to $9,000 is permitted
Answer:
No contribution can be made because the woman does not have earned income
Explanation:
Unlike in the previous years before 2019, concerning divorce agreements, alimony is now declared to be no longer deductible by the payor and at the same time is considered to be a tax-free income to the recipient. In essence, this indicates that alimony is no longer qualifies as earned income and therefore, cannot be utilized to fund an Individual Retirement Account.
Hence, in this case, since it is , year 2020, the correct answer is "No contribution can be made because the woman does not have earned income."
Answer:
Letter A is correct. <u>TRUE.</u>
Explanation:
This statement is true and supported by the sociological structure of social complexity, which is a concept of analysis of society that reflects the relationship between social behavior through continuous and complex circumstances, such as armed conflicts, emigration patterns and political movements.
This concept supports that human beings are not passive individuals, therefore they search for goals that will improve the quality of life of society, therefore high competition and debates about natural resources will significantly affect the development of government policies, as the sustainability and use of Natural resources are a topic that is widely discussed today, and society increasingly seeks socio-environmental responsibility from organizations and governments, as this is a relevant issue for survival and quality of life. So this issue will influence policy, which is an adaptive and complex system that exists to manage issues that affect society.
