Answer:
Not enough information
Step-by-step explanation:
Add the photo next time
Answer:
2
+
8
+
6Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Lisa invest "$2180.81" in her bank.
Step-by-step explanation:
The given values are:
On Lisa's 62nd birthday,
she withdraw = $10,000
The annuity of $A will remain at 3 percent for 40 years. The retirement pension of $10000 lasts 23 years at rate percentage of 3 but begins 40 years later.
⇒ data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9fca0/9fca0bf4acdc86555cd84a0401bc8fd61b8d2c6b" alt="A\times (\frac{P}{A} ,3 \ percent,40) - 10000 (\frac{P}{A} ,3 \ percent,23)\times \frac{1}{(1.03)40} = 0"
⇒ data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65575/655758dea019ccc1b363576b2ee1a8770348b7c7" alt="A\times 23.1148 - 10000\times 16.4436\times 0.3066 = 0"
⇒ data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8acd2/8acd2dfffce34831c0495aa80ae86582095c7668" alt="A = 10000\times 16.4436\times \frac{0.3066}{23.1148}"
⇒ data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45d15/45d152ce6a32eacdb5e3d78f181ad46da0f38b3e" alt="= 10000\times 16.4436\times 0.0132"
⇒
($)
Answer:
B. He added 3.5 and 5 when he should have multiplied them.
Step-by-step explanation:
Let's observe Joe's steps:
- V = lwh
- 204 = 3.5 * (5) * l
Here, * means to multiply, so we're supposed to multiply 3.5 to 5, which would give you the answer 17.5. Unfortunately, look what Joe got: he obtained the value of 8.5, and if we observe, 3.5 + 5 = 8.5.
That's how we know that Joe added instead of multiplied, as he should have done. Thus, the answer is B.
Answer:
P(t) = 282.2(1.009)^t
Step-by-step explanation:
Look at the attached image.
Hope you can read my handwriting. the image cut off the right side, b = 1.009213324... but question asks to round to nearest thousandth so it's 1.009
For the second part just use the equation to find P when t = -1 and see if P is less than (underpredicts) the number from the question or greater than (overpredicts) the number. I haven't calculated it but I think it will be smaller and thus underpredicts just from looking at the numbers when t = -1