To find the same value as 3 x 1/10 you first have to solve 3 x 1/10
so how to do this is you have to make 3 into a fraction
so to make 3 into a fraction you can put 3 as the numerator and 1 as the denominator
so you multiply
so 3/10 has the same value as 3x1/10
HOPE THIS HELPS!!!
Hello there!
Let's use foil.
First: 4x * 2x = 8x^2
Outside: 4x * -9 = -36x
Inside: -7 * 2x = -14x
Last: -7 * -9 = 63
Now, let's combine these.
8x^2 - 36x - 14x + 63
Finally, we can simplify this
8x - 50x + 63
I hope I helped!
Let me know if you need anything else!
~ Zoe
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
all you have to do is divide each number by 4, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49 ,and 50 until you get a remainder of 1. what I mean is do 2 divided by all the number from 40 50 and do the same with 4,5,8 and 10 until you find one of them that has a remainder of 1. (is a lot of work sorry could't tell you the anwer)
<h3>
Answer:</h3>
- A
- B
<h3>
Step-by-step explanation:</h3>
1. A decrease of 3.8% is equivalent to a multiplier fraction of -0.038. The only answer choice that has such a multiplier is A.
In an instance such as this, the "rate" is usually some (fractional) change in some period of time. Since the exponent must be unitless, the rate is effectively (some fraction) "per year" so that multiplying by "t" years cancels the units and results in a pure number.
___
<em>Comment on the exponential</em>
If the actual change were -3.8% per year, the exponential term would look like (1 - 0.038)^t = 0.962^t. By writing it as e^(-0.038t), the decrease is effectively compounded continuously. As a result, over a year's time, the decrease is actually about 3.73%, not 3.8%.
_____
2. If ║x/2║ is a magnitude function, answer choices B and D are equivalent. Thus, we must assume it is a "greatest integer" function. Then the number of desserts prepared will be ║x/2║, and the corresponding revenue will be 1.2║x/2║. Since x is in minutes, 2 to 4 hours will be 120–240 minutes. The appropriate choice is B.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
This is a compound inequality that basically states that the X value is greater than or equal to -5, but less than or equal to -1. It is inclusive, because it includes both numbers and therefore should have an equal to sign (
) instead of just less than or greater than ( < or >).
