Answer:
Third Person!
Explanation:
Based on the provided context of the question, I believe you are asking what POV (Point of View) the script is taking place in. Which would be the <u>Third Person.</u>
Wanna know why?
First Person - Would be speaking as if the person were you, using words such as "I"
Second Person - The narrative of the story would be describing the reader as the character, using words such as "You"
Third Person - The narrative of the story is from the outside view, using words like "he or she."
Hope I helped, have a wonderful day.
Explanation:
Buddhism and Hinduism agree on karma, dharma, moksha and reincarnation. They are different in that Buddhism rejects the priests of Hinduism, the formal rituals, and the caste system. Buddha urged people to seek enlightenment through meditation.
Answer:
Anoche bebí una cerveza artesanal, hecha por un amigo (1 D.) que produce su cerveza con maltas provenientes de Querétaro (3 I.D.).
Desayuné pan, comprado en una tienda que no lo produce (1 D, 2 I.D), con mermelada de zarzamoras, hecha por un amigo (1 D.) que compró larga cantidad de zarzamoras - es temporada de zarzamoras.
Luego bebí un café, con café orgánico de Chiapas que una asociación de comercio justo me provee (5 D, 3 I.D).
La comida eran nopales (1 D, 3 I.D) con queso oaxaca. Los nopales (familia de cactus) crecen por doquier en nuestro estado. El queso oaxaca (1 D. 4 I.D.) compramos en una tienda colectiva y no está hecho en Oaxaca sino aquí.
La cena consistió de unos tamales oaxaqueños (2 D, 5 I.D) con hojas de plátano,masa de maíz, mole y pollo. sólo el último ingrediente tiene dudosa procedencia.
Ah! Compré una botella de limoncello (licor italiano de limon) que un amigo (1 D) francés hace con su propia cosecha de limones.
Explanation:
D = Directo
I.D. = Indirecto
Answer:
The given situation is an example of an<u> (A) External cost</u>
Explanation:
The Coase theorem is a theorem of economics and law, which states that in presence of an externality, if trade is possible and the transaction costs are low then the bargaining will result in a Pareto efficient outcome, despite of the property's initial allocation.
Therefore, this theorem describes the economic efficiency of an economic outcome in the presence of externalities.
As given, the parties in the college fraternity party is a negative externality as it can impose an external cost to the third party.
<u>Therefore, this is an example of an external cost. </u>