Answer:
The correct answer to the following question will be Option C.
Explanation:
- The strategy execution method offers a systematic framework to explain, interact, enforce, and conduct policy. The objective of this project would be to ensure that the organization focuses on building value-added technologies and implementing value-optimizing expenditures.
- Bringing together a good leadership people with the highest combination of talents, abilities, as well as the desire to do tasks has become one of the measures to follow to initiate this venture.
Other choices have no relation with the specified scenario. So Option C seems to be the right response.
Answer:
Gross pay:
- consultant $4,000
- computer programmer $3,300
- administrator $2,800
Net pay:
- consultant $2,767.98
- computer programmer $2,295.48
- administrator $1,993.98
Explanation:
regular earnings overtime withholding
allowances
Consultant $4,000 per week N/A 2
Computer programmer $60 per hour 1.5 1
Administrator $50 per hour 2 2
computer programmer worked 50 hours = ($60 x 40) + ($60 x 10 x 1.5) = $3,300
administrator worked 48 hours = ($50 x 40) + ($50 x 8 x 2) = $2,800
Social security taxes:
-
Consultant = 6% x $4,000 = $240
- Computer programmer = 6% x $3,300 = $198
- Administrator = 6% x $2,800 = $168
Medicare taxes:
- Consultant = 1.5% x $4,000 = $60
- Computer programmer = 1.5% x $3,300 = $49.50
- Administrator = 1.5% x $2,800 = $42
Federal income taxes:
- Consultant: amount subject to withholding = $4,000 - (2 x $75) = $3,850. Federal income taxes = $356.90 + [28% x ($3,850 - $1,796) = $932.02
- Computer programmer = amount subject to withholding = $3,300 - (1 x $75) = $3,225. Federal income taxes = $356.90 + [28% x ($3,225 - $1,796) = $757.02
- Administrator = amount subject to withholding = $2,800 - (2 x $75) = $2,650. Federal income taxes = $356.90 + [28% x ($2,650 - $1,796) = $596.02
Gross pay:
- consultant $4,000
- computer programmer $3,300
- administrator $2,800
Net pay:
- consultant $4,000 - ($240 + $60 + $932.02) = $2,767.98
- computer programmer $3,300 - ($198 + $49.50 + $757.02) = $2,295.48
- administrator $2,800 - ($168 + $42 + $596.02) = $1,993.98
.... She attempts to influence her clients to switch to printing on the new materials. This is known as a proactive type of approach
This is further explained below.
<h3>What is
a proactive type of approach?</h3>
Generally, Proactive actions prepare for the future. Proactivity is a desired attribute in an individual, team, or organization. Reactive methods wait for the future to happen before acting.
In conclusion, "Loretta is a product manager at a popular printing company. Though none of her small business clients have requested to print on recycled paper, Loretta decides to stock some recycled paper products anyway because she sees this as an opportunity to increase her company’s reputation for sustainability. She attempts to influence her clients to switch to printing on the new materials." is a proactive type of approach
Read more about the proactive type of approach
brainly.com/question/18762497
#SPJ1
Answer:
Yes, it is worth $4 to insure a Personal Digital Assistant
Explanation:
Eery action has its benefits and disadvantage. The benefits of sending your cousins a Personal Digital Assistant mail is of great benefit to him. Therefore, if the chances of losing it to damage or lost is two percent, whereas with four percent, the damage or lost is covered and insured. Then the later becomes inevitable.
Evaluating it further it is better to lose additional charges for a set purpose, than to lose its capita l values .
Answer:
c.$1,080,000 for A; $648,000 for B
Explanation:
For computing the total direct material purchase first we have to find out the production units which are shown below:
As we know that
Production units = Ending inventory units + sales units - beginning inventory units
= 9,000 units + 75,000 units - 12,000 units
= 72,000 units
Now the total direct material purchase for Material A and Material B is
For Material A
= 72,000 units × 3 lbs × $5 per lb
= $1,080,000
For Material B
= 72,000 units × 0.5 lbs × $18 per lb
= $648,000
Therefore, the third option is correct
