Not sure but because I don’t know your answer right now I’ll make sure to know it next time.
"There are fewer close substitutes for the product your team supports" will improve your bargaining position with customers.
<u>Option: B</u>
<u>Explanation:</u>
Bargaining is the procedure which is preferred by citizens not only with street shops but it is famous internationally too, where defense, economic trade deal, etc are signed between two different nations to corporate and shake hand of unity. Bargaining is more effective when one allow seller to know that the party itself have more substitutes if the product is not provided by the seller in appropriate rate.
For an instance, if India need to buy some rolling defense helicopters for nation from Russia but prices are high and United States is providing same material with lower price or may be with better rewards on buying from them.
Answer: (B) Non-profit
Explanation:
The non-profit organization is one of the type of charitable association that do not paying any type of tax and it basically operating on the basis of scientific, educational and the religious purpose.
According to the given question, Judy is basically starting the new business and she recognizing the various types of music activities socialization and also the memory challenging process for the senior citizen.
She is using the excess funds for developing the programs rather than focusing on the personal profit. Hence, on the basis of given scenario, Judy organization is classifying as non-profit organization.
Therefore, Option (B) is correct answer.
Answer:
The correct answer is the option A: True.
Explanation:
To begin with, the <em>"Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914"</em> is the name given to a law that was part of United States antitrust law regime that had the main purpose of adding further substance to it in order to prevent anticompetitive practices by the companies in the market. Therefore that this law discusses four principles of economic trade and business which were the price discrimination, mergers and acquisitions, exclusive dealings and any person who was a manager of two or more organizations at the same time. It all focused on protecting the competition from the companies that looked for becoming a monopoly.
Yes, stores should be forced to obey minimum prices for a good or a company that is selling a service should as well. They should have to obey by this so that price competition isn't ongoing in the market. Larger producers can often charge a smaller amount for a product because they are producing them in high qualities. By charging less it gives them a competitive advantage over their competition in means of price. Unless the item is on clearance because a company is discontinuing stock of that item, they should have a set minimum as they do a set maximum they are allowed to charge for that item.
