Answer:
Of the options provided, the characteristic that applies to Max Weber's ideal type of bureaucracy is Option D. A set of rules govern the conduct of officials at all levels of the organization.
Explanation:
Weber described many ideal types of public administration and governance in his book called Economy and Society, published in 1922. He noted that traditional, charismatic, and rational-legal or bureaucratic were the three kinds of power in organizations. For Weber, in the bureaucratic system legitimacy is believed to come from a legal order. There are six dimensions to the nature of the bureaucratic organization for Weber: Administrative class, hierarchy, division of work, official rules, impersonal relationships, and official record. The advantages of bureaucracy are consistency in employee behavior because employees are certain of the rules and their duties and responsibilities are clearly defined. The management process is easier as a result. But in terms of disadvantages, the rules in a bureaucracy can make it hard to innovate or to change behaviors and strict adherence to rules can lead to inefficiencies over time if there are a lot of reporting requirements or red tape, for instance.
The true statement(s) are: A (Electrons are larger than protons) and B (Atoms are the smallest living organism) Plze mark brainiest:)
Answer:
Provide retrospective but not predictive explanations of development.
Explanation:
There are some critiques to the Evolutionary Theories, among them: Biological Deterministic way of seeing the Hominideos and in many ways reductionist, to make it complex things simpler.
Analyzing the options then:
Provide retrospective but not predictive explanations of development.
These theories were not able to fulfill a model of predicting the future, leaving it blank for speculations. Also, it does not provide a cohesive and coherent basis model to predict the Post Homo Sapiens' future.
Despite those and other criticisms, this hasn't been enough to discard the Evolutionary Theories. On the other hand, the criticisms should be open for the sake of science.
