ANSWER
No, because there is no common ratio
EXPLANATION
The given sequence is
-1, 1, 4, 8
If this sequence is geometric, then there should be a common ratio among the consecutive terms.

Hence the sequence
-1, 1, 4, 8
is not a geometric sequence.
Check the picture below
if your calculator is in Degree mode, you'll get the angle in degrees, if in Radian mode, you'll get radians get taking the inverse sine, so you know
Answer:
115
Step-by-step explanation:
because 6 & 7 will add up to 180
so if 7 = 65
then 180 - 65 = 115
#6 = 115
Answer:
67º <33
Step-by-step explanation:
180-46= 134º
134/2= 67º
Answer:
7 : 8
Step-by-step explanation:
150 adults complete a survey. 80 are women. Thus the ratio of number of men to number of women . Therefore the number of men to number of women be 7 : 8