Due to the conditions, my answer would be 100.
Answer:
x=2
Step-by-step explanation:
logx (2x)^3 = 6
We can rewrite without the exponent
3 logx (2x) = 6
Divide by 3
3/3 logx (2x) = 6/3
logx (2x) = 2
Raise each side to the base x
x^ logx (2x) =x^ 2
2x = x^2
Subtract 2x from each side
2x-2x = x^2 -2x
0 = x^2 -2x
Factor an x
0 = x(x-2)
Using the zero product property
x =0 x-2 =0
x =0 x=2
We cannot have a base of 0, so x cannot equal 0
x=2
Okay first you need to convert 0.2 to a percentage which would be 20% then 20% + 20% = 40% then it says he read 50%, 50% of 36 means that you have to multiply 36 two times to get, 72 then you do 72 * 40% = 28.8 = 29 + 72 = 101 pages in all then 101- 40%= 60.6 is how many pages were read on Monday and Tuesday.
Answer:
<h2>Kelly is wrong, with this congruent parts, we can conclude that triangles are congruent.</h2>
Step-by-step explanation:
To demonstrate congruent triangles, we need to use the proper postulates. There are at least 5 postulates we can use.
- Angle-Angle-Side Theorem (AAS theorem).
- Hypotenuse-Leg Theorem (HL theorem).
- Side-Side-Side Postulate (SSS postulate).
- Angle-Side-Angle Postulate (ASA postulate).
- Side-Angle-Side Postulate (SAS postulate).
In this case, Kelly SAS postulate, because the corresponding sides-angles-sides are congruent, i.e., KL ≅ MN and LM ≅ KN, also, all corresponding angles are congruent.
So, as you can see, only using SAS postulate, the congruency can be demonstrated. (Refer to the image attached to see an example of SAS postulate)
Answer: A. 724
Step-by-step explanation: