1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
zavuch27 [327]
3 years ago
5

I will mark you Brainliest if your response is correct. Also, I'm offering 20 points.

Mathematics
2 answers:
posledela3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

740 m^2

Step-by-step explanation:

scZoUnD [109]3 years ago
5 0

We have 6 triangles with base 10 and height 16. That means the area of each triangle is 10 * 16 / 2, which is 80 m^2.

The area of a hexagon is 3√3 * a^2 / 2. a is the side length, which is shown to be 10. So, 3√3 * 100 / 2 = 150√3 m^2 for the area of the hexagon. Rounded to the nearest whole number, it's 260 m^2.

If each triangle is 80 and there's 6 of them, total that's 480 m^2 for the triangles. Add the 260 and you get a surface area of 740 m^2.

You might be interested in
I need help please!!!!!
charle [14.2K]
Obtuse angle. If wrong I’m sorry lol
5 0
3 years ago
The angles featured below are ______ angles
oee [108]

Answer:

its normall

Step-by-step explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Steve walks o.6 miles to school and 0.6 miles home again each day how many feet does Steven walk in 5 days (1 miles = 5,280 feet
insens350 [35]

Answer:

31680 feet

Step-by-step explanation:

Total distance walked in 5 days

= 5 × (0.6 miles × 2)

= 5 × 1.2 miles

= 5 × 6336 feet

= 31680 feet

7 0
2 years ago
What is the solution to the equation
Dimas [21]

Answer:

D) 21!

Step-by-step explanation:

So what we are dealing with here is some fractions that need to be made equal

Think about the fractions 1/2 and 2/4. They look different, right?

Well really, they are equal to another. All we need to do is simplify them!

If we divide the numerator and denominator (the top and bottom) of the fraction by, lets say, 2!

2 / 2 = 1

-          -

4 / 2 = 2

And viola! It's been simplified down, and now we can see they are alike!

2 pieces of a pie cut in 4 pieces is the same as 1 piece of a pie cut in half!

(pro-tip, always try dividing a fraction by 2 first)

So now, using the same principal, we can solve this problem

By taking the denominators and dividing them like this:

35 / 5 = 7

We get 7! Now since we need to make these fractions equal, lets multiply the 7 we just got by the numerator of the second fraction, 3

7 x 3 = 21

So if we put the 21 over the 35, we get 21/35!

Thus, our answer is 21!

6 0
3 years ago
Three forces act on an object. Two of the forces are at an angle of 95◦ to each other and have magnitudes 35 N and 7 N. The thir
Cerrena [4.2K]

We want to find \vec F_4 such that the object needs is in equilibrium:

\vec F_1+\vec F_2+\vec F_3+\vec F_4=\vec0

We're told that F_1=35\,\mathrm N, F_2=7\,\mathrm N, and F_3=9\,\mathrm N. We also know the angle between \vec F_1 and \vec F_2 is 95º, which means

\vec F_1\cdot\vec F_2=F_1F_2\cos95^\circ=245\cos95^\circ

\vec F_3 is perpendicular to both \vec F_1 and \vec F_2, so \vec F_1\cdot\vec F_3=\vec F_2\cdot\vec F_3=0.

If we take the dot product of \vec F_1 with the sum of all four vectors, we get

\vec F_1\cdot(\vec F_1+\vec F_2+\vec F_3+\vec F_4)=0

\vec F_1\cdot\vec F_1+\vec F_1\cdot\vec F_2+\vec F_1\cdot\vec F_3+\vec F_1\cdot\vec F_4=0

{F_1}^2+\vec F_1\cdot\vec F_2+0+\vec F_1\cdot\vec F_4=0

\implies\vec F_1\cdot\vec F_4=-\left({F_1}^2+\vec F_1\cdot\vec F_2\right)

We can do the same thing with \vec F_2 and \vec F_3:

\vec F_2\cdot(\vec F_1+\vec F_2+\vec F_3+\vec F_4)=0

\implies\vec F_2\cdot\vec F_4=-\left(\vec F_1\cdot\vec F_2+{F_2}^2\right)

\vec F_3\cdot(\vec F_1+\vec F_2+\vec F_3+\vec F_4)=0

\implies\vec F_3\cdot\vec F_4=-{F_3}^2

Finally, if we do this with \vec F_4, we get

\vec F_4\cdot(\vec F_1+\vec F_2+\vec F_3+\vec F_4)=0

\implies{F_4}^2=-\left(\vec F_1\cdot\vec F_4+\vec F_2\cdot\vec F_4+\vec F_3\cdot\vec F_4\right)

\implies{F_4}^2=-\left(-\left({F_1}^2+\vec F_1\cdot\vec F_2\right)-\left(\vec F_1\cdot\vec F_2+{F_2}^2\right)-{F_3}^2\right)

\implies F_4=\sqrt{{F_1}^2+{F_2}^2+{F_3}^2+2(\vec F_1\cdot\vec F_2)}

\implies\boxed{F_4\approx36.2\,\mathrm N}

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A. 67 B. 135 C. 75 D. 150
    7·1 answer
  • Write 2.161616 as a mixed number
    7·1 answer
  • A carpenter cuts a 2 meter lenght of wood into 6 pieces. What is the length ofeach pieces? Give you answer to the nearest whole
    6·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP!!! <br> EXPLANATIONS ARE APPRECIATED
    14·2 answers
  • Thx u help now ok yeah
    10·1 answer
  • Please help me find the length
    5·1 answer
  • Hello im in 8th grade and I need to get my grades up so anyone know the answer to
    6·1 answer
  • The resulting row 1 entries are:<br> 7.12<br> 7.10<br> 7,9
    6·2 answers
  • Identify the initial value-y=3(14)4
    5·1 answer
  • Lindsey found a cupcake and weighed it on a digital scale. The cupcake weight 0.35 lb. what is the weight of the Rock in expande
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!