Depending on the spread of the bloodstain.
Blood stain that spread in large distance within small pebbles usually indicates a hard force such as blunt weapons attack or bullets
If the bloodstain is gushing down like a pool, it indicates a stabbing incidents using sharp objects.
I believe the statement is true. Former Olympian Bruce Jenner won an endorsement deal for wheaties in his post-athletic career. <span>Jenner knew he would get </span>endorsement deals after winning<span> gold in the olympics. Hope this answers the question. Have a nice day.</span>
I think the right answer would be intercultural
Answer:
A correlation is only a mathematical means of describing the relationship between variables. When it is a positive correlation, it means when the value of one increases, for example, the value of the other variable also increases or when one decreases, so does the other. A negative correlation would show that as one variable increases in value, the other decreases. These relationships are non-causal as you're not manipulating variables to control them to see what is causing this relationship. Sometimes, non-causal covariance (or variables that don't have an effect on each other vary cooincidentally in a pattern-like fashion, when there is actually another variable causing the relationship going on.
Explanation:
In the case of this example, it is doubtful that having money causes you to have a higher grade point average. So while we see an increase in grade point average with those who have high income it could be due to other factors, like people with more money have access to learning tools, tutors and other things that people with less money don't have access to. So it is access to tools, not money that is actually causing a difference. There are likely dozens if not hundreds of other potential confounded variables that could be causing this observation.
Explanation:
(i)One religious community does not dominate another. (ii)Some members do not dominate other members of the same religious community. (iii)The State does not enforce any particular religion nor does it take away the religious freedom of individuals..(iv) No state laws could be made against religious system
Can give me brainliest and thanks.
