Answer:According to the article, when companies earn patents specifically to prevent competition, it hinders the innovation of products that might actually be better. For instance, Bruce Nolop describes how his company had to pay more attention to the "minefield of existing patents than on the expected value that we could bring to customers." Rosabeth Moss Kanter suggests a "use it or lose it" solution to this problem. She thinks that a company that patents an item would be forced to use the patented idea or product or risk losing the patent. This idea would encourage more competition and prevent patent abuse.
Explanation:
Answer:
could likely result in a notable loss of sales to competitors
Explanation:
In the case of the perfect competitive market wheen the price of the firm is increased from $179 to $199 as compared to the prevailing market price so this means that there should be the loss with respect to the sales for the competitors or rivalrs as this would result the firm to lose its overall shares to its rivalry
Therefore the above statement should be considered true
Answer:
Exclude people from your property
