The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although the question does not provide any options, we can say that the ethical standard that waiting to propose the study violates is "Informed Consent to Research."
In this case, Professor Hammond, first, had to inform the students about the study she was doing so the students were aware of this situation is class. So once she notified the class about her research, then ask them their consent to participate in the study. They probably had to sign a document that serves as an agreement of their participation. The students then would be aware of the details of the research and they would decide if they want to be part of the study. That is the ethical way to proceed.
I believe the answer is: B.the American Revolution
during the american revolution, The american colonists justify the action to revolve by stating that they felt that the british government treated them unfairly and they need to get out from their influence through the revolution. Jefferson Davis at that time argue that the southern states' action was the exact same thing.
Answer: Stimulus perception relationship
Explanation:
Stimulus perception relationship could be defined as the ability for an organism to react based on an action on it by another party. This relationship is used to know the behavior of an organism. Jamie's action of using shadows for the cat and wanting to see the cats reaction is understood to be a stimulus perception relationship.
Because— politicians play crucial roles in governing our society
