1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
LuckyWell [14K]
3 years ago
11

Which of the following is true regarding a restrictive adjectival clause?

English
1 answer:
andre [41]3 years ago
7 0

The statement that is true regarding restrictive adjectival clause is it will follow a general noun and is not set off by commas. Restrictive adjective clause limits the meaning the noun it modifies. Unlike Nonrestrictive Adjective Clause, the Restrictive clause should not be set off by commas. 

You might be interested in
Choose an antonym for gargantuan
MrRissso [65]
The answer is B. Dainty Hope this helped :)
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Music is an important element of a student education one study says that schools with music programs have a graduation rate of a
Pavlova-9 [17]
Thank for you thank you please let us have some one for me thank for you thank you sir how are you doing today please please send us a text thank me you know how I do I miss thank
Thank for you thank you please let us help
3 0
3 years ago
Which sentence best states Nhamo's feelings about home in "The Setting Sun and the Rolling World"?​
WITCHER [35]

Answer:

the sentence it self explains it all

4 0
2 years ago
Which type of sentence is this?
krek1111 [17]

Answer:

a compound and complex

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Write a title of your essay on the top line. (convert into Passive )​
Harrizon [31]

Answer:

A New Constitution and a History of “Democracy”

A glance at the late 18th century U.S. political system reveals that the new Constitution was the law of a highly undemocratic land. The early United States was a society in which entire sections of the population were denied basic human rights, where the institutions of the new government were not derived from egalitarian principles, and where millions of people did not receive adequate political representation. As the overarching political instrument of the era, the Constitution bears responsibility for a society in which the many toiled without representation for the benefit of a powerful few.

Perhaps the most egregious example of the Constitution’s anti-democratic features was its sanction of the widespread practice of slavery. Rather than ending slavery, the Constitution allowed planters and others to hold their fellow human beings as chattel. Not only did the Constitution permit the existing system of slavery to continue, it permitted the Atlantic slave trade to keep “importing” slaves for 20 more years. It counted a slave as three-fifths of a human being; moreover, this provision was inserted not to protect the rights of the enslaved but to boost the electoral power of the slave states. Such a provision was not the only institutional failure of the Constitution.

The arrangement of the new federal government in the Constitution was highly unrepresentative. The president was elected indirectly through the Electoral College, while the Supreme Court was completely appointed. In the remaining branch of government, the upper house, the Senate, provided for each state to have equal representation without regard for how many people lived in the state. By diluting the power of the franchise, the Constitution made a system that was destined to be unrepresentative even more undemocratic. Only the House of Representatives nominally derived its power from the people, and its character was deeply affected by who could and could not vote.

The Constitution allowed states to set norms for who could vote in elections and who could not. In the early United States, that meant that people who did not own sufficient property, enslaved people, and women were denied the vote. A government allegedly founded on the idea of “no taxation without representation” violated this rallying cry of the American Revolution. As a result of the Constitution, a majority of people in the early United States could not vote for their representatives.

Rather than promoting a government “of the people, by the people, and for the people,” the Constitution sanctioned practices and structured institutions that were unrepresentative. Ordinary people, whether because they were enslaved, because they were women, or because they were working-class people, lived and worked without any real power. Instead, a small minority of wealthy and powerful men ruled over the majority of the population; the source of their power was the undemocratic Constitution of the United States.  

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In which statement from his speech does Gandhi explicitly state his purpose?​
    15·1 answer
  • How does the author show that Bella has a romantic streak?
    7·2 answers
  • What does BMW stand for?
    6·2 answers
  • Which of the following is an example of adaptation. A short story presented as a play. A movie review. A story presented in its
    15·2 answers
  • The purpose of outlining each step in a goal is to
    6·1 answer
  • 14.
    15·2 answers
  • Read this sentence fragment.
    14·1 answer
  • Need help on this asap ​
    13·1 answer
  • What type of figurative language is a slender beak as weak as a needle
    12·2 answers
  • The word “fat” often carries a negative connotation. Write a story or observation where something fat is celebrated.
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!