Answer:
b. $39,000.
Explanation:
Inventory & Fixed assets will be recognized at historic rate.
Accounts receivable will be recognized at closing rate.
Accounts receivable = FC 30,000 * 0.7
Accounts receivable = $21,000
Inventory = FC 20,000 * 0.6
Inventory = $12,000
Fixed assets = FC 10,000 * 0.6
Fixed assets = $6,000
Total = Accounts receivable + Inventory + Fixed assets
Total = $21,000 + $12,000 + $6,000
Total = $39,000
Answer:
Unsystematic risk
Explanation:
<em>The portfolio theory posits that the total risk on a collection of assets (i,e a portfolio) can be reduced by spreading the invested fund into different assets that are uncorrelated.</em>
<em>According to this model, the total risk on a portfolio is divided into systematic and unsystematic risks. The theory assumed by diversification, the unsystematic risk associated with a portfolio is eliminated.</em>
Unsystematic risk essentially are those unique individual assets for example. if we invest in company stock, risk associated with factors like bad management , law suit against a company, defect in company;s products are example of unique or systematic risks
Answer:
50,000
Explanation:
Hughes Corporation can calculate the incremental cash outflow required to acquire the new machine by just deducting the sales proceeds from the cost of the new machine.
DATA
New machine = $150,000
Old machine = 100,000
Cash outflow per year (18,000 - 10,000) = 8,000
Salvage value = 25,000
Annuity factor = 8%
Solution
Incremental Cash outflow = Cost of new machine - Sales proceeds from old machine
Incrementa Cash outflow = 150,000 - 100,000
Incremental Cash outflow = $50,000
This answer requires that we fill in the blanks. The answers are contained in the bullet to fill the missing places
- shareholder wealth
- larger the NPV
- higher stock price.
- WACC
- accept the project.
- higher positive NPV.
<h3>What is the NPV?</h3>
This is the term that is used to refer to the net present value. This is the value that is calculated as the difference between the cash inflows and out flows for over a time period.
In order to get the NPV we have to make the following calculations for the projects A and B.
We have:
<u>For Project A</u>
-900 + 620/1.08 + 395/1.08² + 200/1.08³ + 250/1.08⁴
= $355. 237
<u> project B</u>
we would have
-900 + 620/1.08 + 395/1.08² + 200/1.08³ + 250/1.08⁴
= 378.98
The value for the project B happens to be greater than that of A hence this is the value that we have to accept
Read more on NPV here:
brainly.com/question/17185385
#SPJ1
Answer:
2. False
Explanation:
Capacity to a contract refers to whether the person to a contract is legally competent to enter into such a contract.
For instance, lunatics, drunkards, minors, criminals and person of unsound mind are deemed incapable of entering into a contract.
A person diagnosed with dementia, which impairs his decision making would normally be regarded as incapable to signing a contract.
But, capacity is ascertained as per the situation i.e at the time the contract is signed or entered into.
In the given case, Ronald entered a contract while he was sane and in healthy state of mind. His judgement at the time of entering such a contract wasn't impaired by dementia.
Thus, the contract will be legally enforceable as per the law.