Answer:
This responsiveness also promotes the local market orientation of a subsidiary and therefore the strength of its existing network with the businessmen and government authorities.
Explanation:
Usually, firms working within the global market confront two sorts of competitive pressure. They face pressure to scale back costs and pressure to react locally. These competing forces throw a corporation into conflict. It's going to also need a corporation to supply a consistent product on the international market to downstream the experience curve as soon as feasible. In response to local pressures, however, it's necessary for a firm to differentiate its product offering and marketing strategy from one country to a different in an effort to satisfy the various demands arising from domestic consumer preferences, business practices, channels of distribution, competitive conditions and public policies. Because it's going to entail substantial redundancy and a scarcity of product standards to adapt products to varied domestic needs, the result could also be a rise in prices.
While some organizations, like Company A, face a high to scale back cost and low for the reaction of locally, while others, like Company B, face low to scale back costs and high for local reaction, many companies are within the situation of Company C. It suggests and supports three layers of variables, including environmental, structural, and organizational responsiveness. The analysis of 168 MNE companies within the People's Republic of China shows that environmental complexity and therefore the uniqueness of business culture increase local reaction. Structural variables like the intensity of competition, heterogeneity of demand and localisation of components increase local reaction.
The answer is False because they didn't plan functions as a local law..this is my opinion.
Michael
is creating an atmosphere
in which his department members are so afraid of conflict and so
eager for harmony that their decision making becomes uncritical,
irrational, and dysfunctional. This psychological phenomenon is known
as groupthink.
Answer:
d. $18,900 unfavorable.
Explanation:
Direct labor efficiency variance = SR*(SH-AH)
18000 = SR*(63000-61500)
18000 = 1500 SR
SR = $12
Total standard direct labor cost for February = 63000*12= $756,000
Direct labor flexible-budget variance = $774,900 - $756,000 = $18900 Unfavorable
