Explanation:
la Corte Suprema de Justicia convalidó la facultad policial de detener sin orden judicial a personas en "actitud sospechosa
En el caso del numeral 1 de este artículo, si la búsqueda o persecución ha sido interrumpida, se requiere orden judicial. En ningún caso se puede practicar el arresto cuando se trate de infracciones de acción privada o de aquellas en las que no está prevista pena privativa de libertad.
Answer:
no ones going to answer that i'm just stating facts
Explanation:
Answer:
the 1960s
Explanation:
The answer of your question is the 1960 or A
The case chosen for discussion is the Gibbons v. Ogden 1824 case, which accorded Congress the authority to regulate commerce and navigation, thereby confirming that federal law takes precedence over state laws.
<h3>What was the Gibbons v. Ogden 1824 case?</h3>
The Gibbons v. Ogden case involved a dispute over shipping monopolies in New York.
When the case reached the Supreme Court, it was decided that Congress had the authority to regulate commerce and navigation according to the Constitution's Commerce Clause.
The implication is that Congress exercises authority over interstate and some intrastate commerce.
Thus, Gibbons v. Ogden expanded the federal powers over the states as a landmark decision.
Learn more about Gibbons v. Ogden at brainly.com/question/10443322
#SPJ1
Answer:
same ✋
but I'm here if you want to talk about it