Answer:
The encounter of the Native American with Cabeza de vaca, Coronado La salle or a catholic missionary would provoke strangeness and even fear. Because of the aesthetic difference between these individuals and the lack of knowledge of the Indian. Abaio follows a paragraph on how an American Indian would describe this encounter to another American Indian.
Explanation:
Suddenly I was able to see a man approaching, it was strange colored, it presented different skins and elements to the necks I saw before. I ran into the forest to hide, because I looked like a man, but I didn't know if it was dangerous. This man seems to have come from a very distant tribe and outside the standards we know, besides, he spoke things that I couldn't understand, it seemed more that he was just making sounds to his fellow men, as animals do.
There are several ways in which we could justify this statement, but also many ways in which we would be able to challenge it.
In terms of support, we can argue that this was the case because the cultures of America did not have any significant contact with the cultures of Africa or Oceania until the arrival of the Europeans. We can also support this by the fact that the Andean cultures and the Mesoamerican cultures had no contact with each other.
However, there are several factors that show that this was not the case, or that the claim might be exaggerated. For example, we know that many groups in Africa had extensive interactions with each other. For example, the expansion of the Bantu that took place over large regions in Africa. Another challenge could be the extensive contact that many Mesoamerican groups had with each other.
Answer:B is the answer hope this helps
Explanation: have a great day
Answer:
The correct answer is: <em>B. A study of the types and prevalence of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in small rural towns in a mid-western state.</em>
Explanation:
Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) is a topic that has had stigma, negative stereotypes and other negative connotations attached to it throughout history. If a study investigated the types and prevalence of STIs in small rural towns in a mid-western state, along with stigmatizing participants in the study, the results of this study could also potentially stigmatize residents of these towns by extrapolating claims such as "town <em>X </em>in this mid-western state has high prevalence of various types of STIs". These claims might make it seem like the presence of STIs is high in a given rural town (when this in fact might be untrue), especially considering the town is small in size. In this way, a study that investigates the types and prevalence of STIs in small rural towns in a mid-western state could produce harm to members of the sampled population who do not actually participate in the research study.
Answer:
All the statements are true
Explanation:
Viscosity is affected by temperature. For example, if we put heat over some liquids like honey and syrup, they tend to flow more freely. On the other hand, if the temperature gets cold the viscosity tends to thicken (ex: engine oil of a car during winter). These examples make the first statement true: “Viscosity increases as temperature decreases”. Viscosity is affected by pressure too. To see a change in a “molecular level”, the pressure needs to be very extreme. This make the second statement true: “Viscosity increases as molecular weight increases”. Taking in consideration both statements, we can conclude that the third statement is also correct. When viscosity is put into heat and little pressure, it tends to lessen, since the interaction between the molecules decreases and the intermolecular forces decreases. On the other hand, by default, when viscosity is put in a cold weather and pressure increases, the level of viscosity thickens, since the molecules start colliding and their motion becomes disorganized.
