Answer:
Option (B) is correct.
Explanation:
The utility maximization point for a consumer is as follows:
It is given that,
price of Pepsi(x) = $1 per can
price of a hamburger(y) = $2
Marginal utility from Pepsi = 4
Marginal utility from hamburgers = 6
Hence,
4 > 3
Therefore, it can be seen that the consumer's utility is not maximized at this point.
Law of diminishing marginal utility states that as the consumer consumes more and more quantity of goods then as a result the utility obtained from the consumption goes on diminishing.
So, there is a need to increase the quantity of Pepsi consumed and reducing the quantity of hamburgers consumed.
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "The government will pay firms to give some workers extra pay to increase the total economy." <span>Is it wise for a firm to employ a worker at $20 per hour when another worker does the same job for $10 per hour? </span>
Maldonia must give up 8 units of TEA to get 16 units of lemons, while Desonia must give up 8 units of tea to get 4 get units of lemons. Hence the opportunity cost of productivity are units of lemon for Maldonia -0.5y(-8/16), and for Desonia it is -2y(-8/4).This means Maldonia has comparative advantage in producing lemon and Desonia has comparative advantage in tea.
Answer:
B. $29,000
Explanation:
The cashflow from operating activities is calculated as below:
Cashflow from operating activities = Net income + Depreciation - Working capital investment
= Net income + Depreciation - (Change in inventories + Change in account receivables - Change in account payables)
Putting all the number together, we have:
123,000 = Net income + 38,000 - [(-27,000) + 31,000 - 48,000 - 12,000),
Solve the equation we get Net income = 29,000.
