1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Olegator [25]
3 years ago
10

How many 0.2-liter glasses of water are contained in a 3.6-liter pitcher

Mathematics
2 answers:
jolli1 [7]3 years ago
4 0
18 glasses of water

3.6/.2=18
Alexandra [31]3 years ago
3 0
<h2>Answer:</h2>

<u>The answer is </u><u>18 glasses</u>

<h2>Step-by-step explanation:</h2>

Total amount in liters in pitcher = 3.6

Amount of one glass in liters = 0.2 liters

So

Amount of glasses in pitcher will be

3.6 / 0.2

Which comes out to be 18

You might be interested in
This is a point at which a graph intersects the x-axis.
alexandr402 [8]

Answer:

The point where the line crosses the x-axis is called the [x-intercept].

Step-by-step explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HELP ME I NEED HELP PLEASE HELP <br> PLEASE GIVE THE ANSWER UNDER THE QUESTION AND RATIO
Liono4ka [1.6K]

Answer:

6. 225 feet in 3 minutes = 75 feet in 1 minute (slower)

   360 feet in 5 minutes = 72 feet in 1 minute

7. $4 for 5 ounces = $0.80 for 1 ounce (most expensive)

   $14 for 20 ounces = $0.70 for 1 ounce

8. 72 people in 6 hours = 12 people in 1 hour

    117 people in 9 hours = 13 people in 1 hour (greater rate per hour)

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is Tan 46 = x/12
Nostrana [21]
Tbh idk I believe that the answer is 12
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the solution for 2x -4= -8
scoray [572]

Answer:

  x = 48

Step-by-step explanation:

  3x +  9 = 153

 

subtract 9 from both sides               -9       -9

 

                                                     3x = 144

 

divide both sides by 3                    3x/3 = 144/3

2x + (x + 9) = 153

 

2(48) + (48 + 9) = 153

 

96 + 57 = 153

 

153 = 153

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Suppose Upper F Superscript prime Baseline left-parenthesis x right-parenthesis equals 3 x Superscript 2 Baseline plus 7 and Upp
Sedaia [141]

It looks like you're given

<em>F'(x)</em> = 3<em>x</em>² + 7

and

<em>F</em> (0) = 5

and you're asked to find <em>F(b)</em> for the values of <em>b</em> in the list {0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 2.0}.

The first is done for you, <em>F</em> (0) = 5.

For the remaining <em>b</em>, you can solve for <em>F(x)</em> exactly by using the fundamental theorem of calculus:

F(x)=F(0)+\displaystyle\int_0^x F'(t)\,\mathrm dt

F(x)=5+\displaystyle\int_0^x(3t^2+7)\,\mathrm dt

F(x)=5+(t^3+7t)\bigg|_0^x

F(x)=5+x^3+7x

Then <em>F</em> (0.1) = 5.701, <em>F</em> (0.2) = 6.408, <em>F</em> (0.5) = 8.625, and <em>F</em> (2.0) = 27.

On the other hand, if you're expected to <em>approximate</em> <em>F</em> at the given <em>b</em>, you can use the linear approximation to <em>F(x)</em> around <em>x</em> = 0, which is

<em>F(x)</em> ≈ <em>L(x)</em> = <em>F</em> (0) + <em>F'</em> (0) (<em>x</em> - 0) = 5 + 7<em>x</em>

Then <em>F</em> (0) = 5, <em>F</em> (0.1) ≈ 5.7, <em>F</em> (0.2) ≈ 6.4, <em>F</em> (0.5) ≈ 8.5, and <em>F</em> (2.0) ≈ 19. Notice how the error gets larger the further away <em>b </em>gets from 0.

A <em>better</em> numerical method would be Euler's method. Given <em>F'(x)</em>, we iteratively use the linear approximation at successive points to get closer approximations to the actual values of <em>F(x)</em>.

Let <em>y(x)</em> = <em>F(x)</em>. Starting with <em>x</em>₀ = 0 and <em>y</em>₀ = <em>F(x</em>₀<em>)</em> = 5, we have

<em>x</em>₁ = <em>x</em>₀ + 0.1 = 0.1

<em>y</em>₁ = <em>y</em>₀ + <em>F'(x</em>₀<em>)</em> (<em>x</em>₁ - <em>x</em>₀) = 5 + 7 (0.1 - 0)   →   <em>F</em> (0.1) ≈ 5.7

<em>x</em>₂ = <em>x</em>₁ + 0.1 = 0.2

<em>y</em>₂ = <em>y</em>₁ + <em>F'(x</em>₁<em>)</em> (<em>x</em>₂ - <em>x</em>₁) = 5.7 + 7.03 (0.2 - 0.1)   →   <em>F</em> (0.2) ≈ 6.403

<em>x</em>₃ = <em>x</em>₂ + 0.3 = 0.5

<em>y</em>₃ = <em>y</em>₂ + <em>F'(x</em>₂<em>)</em> (<em>x</em>₃ - <em>x</em>₂) = 6.403 + 7.12 (0.5 - 0.2)   →   <em>F</em> (0.5) ≈ 8.539

<em>x</em>₄ = <em>x</em>₃ + 1.5 = 2.0

<em>y</em>₄ = <em>y</em>₃ + <em>F'(x</em>₃<em>)</em> (<em>x</em>₄ - <em>x</em>₃) = 8.539 + 7.75 (2.0 - 0.5)   →   <em>F</em> (2.0) ≈ 20.164

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Find the volume of the composite solid. Round your answer to the nearest hundredth.
    10·1 answer
  • Imagine performing a coin-flip experiment in which the coin is "loaded" in such a way that the probability of landing heads is t
    5·1 answer
  • Write 4.32 in word form
    11·2 answers
  • How is Solving for speed similar to solving for time? They both require that two numbers be added. They both require that two nu
    11·2 answers
  • I will mark brainiest is my answer is right?
    11·2 answers
  • A letter to Europe from the United States cost $.94 to mail. A letter mailed within the United States cost $.44. Nancy mailed fi
    12·1 answer
  • (b) Find the lowest common multiple (LCM) of 450 and 315.
    15·2 answers
  • I’ll give u brainiest pls help me im so lost
    6·1 answer
  • BRAINLIEST PLEASE HELP AND YOU GET BRAINLIEST BRAINLIEST GET BRAINLIEST HELP ME FOR BRAINLIEST​
    8·2 answers
  • decide whether enough information is given to prove that triangle XYZ is congruent to triangle JKL. If so, state the term you us
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!