Answer:
The main point here on the appeal would be the fact that the Sherrods decided to stay silent on the last offer made by the Kidds to settle the situation, and rather decided to go ahead and look for a mandatory arbitration. When the Sherrods did that, the Kidds might have understood that they were not accepting their offer for 34.000 dollars and preffered to settle for the result of the mandatory arbitration, which established the price at 25.000 dollars.
Another point is that there was a big time lapse between the last offer made by the Kidds to settle with the Sherrods and their communicating that they would go for that final settlement offer, especially after the mandatory arbitration had already established a new price. This time lapse should also be taken in favor of the Kidds in their appeal
Finally, the matter should have ended when the final decision for the arbitration was given
So it should be expected that on appeal the decision reached in the mandatory arbritration be upheld, instead of the new sum which was initially assumed not accepted by the Sherrods when they went through with the arbitration.
I’m sure it true i’m not very sure
Answer: As a result an informal norm has become a law.
Even before states had started making it illegal for people to drive while using cell phones, grouping of individuals had already stood against this practice. Thus, we can say that the social movement started at the beginning of the 21st century was what actually made this law come true.
Answer:
(d) Brazil
Explanation:
On October 26, 1917, Brazil declares its decision to enter the First World War on the side of the Allied powers. One day before the U.S. declaration of war, a German U-boat sank the Brazilian merchant ship Parana as it sailed off the coast of France.
It means the president is chosen by which has the most percentage of the population voting for them
