Answer:
None of the expression are equivalent to 
Step-by-step explanation:
Given

Required
Find its equivalents
We start by expanding the given expression

Expand 49


Using laws of indices: 


This implies that; each of the following options A,B and C must be equivalent to
or alternatively, 
A. 
Using law of indices which states;

Applying this law to the numerator; we have

Expand expression in bracket


Also; Using law of indices which states;

becomes

This is not equivalent to 
B. 
Expand numerator


Using law of indices which states;

Applying this law to the numerator; we have


Also; Using law of indices which states;

= 
This is also not equivalent to 
C. 



Using law of indices which states;


This is also not equivalent to 
Answer:
1. Proved down
2. proved down
3. f(10) = -20 - 5 - 5 - 5 - 5 - 5 - 5 - 5 - 5 - 5 - 5
Step-by-step explanation:
Let us explain how to solve the question
∵ f(0) = -20, f(n) = f(n - 1) - 5 for n > 1
→ That means we have an arithmetic sequence with constant
difference -5 and first term -20
1. → f(1) means we need to find the second term, which equal the
term - 5
∵ f(1) means n = 1
∴ f(1) = f(1 - 1) - 5
∴ f(1) = f(0) - 5
∵ f(0) = -20
∴ f(1) = -20 - 5 → Proved
2. → f(3) means we need to find the third term, which equal the
second term - 5
∵ f(3) means n = 3
∴ f(3) = f(3 - 1) - 5
∴ f(3) = f(2) - 5
→ f(2) = f(1) - 5
∵ f(1) = -20 - 5
∴ f(2) = [-20 - 5] - 5 = -20 - 5 - 5
∴ f(3) = [-20 - 5 - 5] - 5
∴ f(3) = -20 - 5 - 5 - 5 → Proved
3. → From 1 and 2 we notice that the number of -5 is equal to n,
at n = 1 there is one (-5), when n= 3 there are three (-5)
∵ n = 10
∴ There are ten (-5)
∴ f(10) = -20 - 5(10)
∴ f(10) = -20 - 5 - 5 - 5 - 5 - 5 - 5 - 5 - 5 - 5 - 5 → Proved
If you mean parallel to another line, you have to find the the equation of that line. Lets just say it was y= 7x-2. To find the slope of a line parallel to that, then you look at the slope of that line, which in this case would be 7. The slope of a line parallel would have to be the same. So, I can't give you a direct answer because I can't see the graph but that is how you get the answer.