Your question is missing the options. I've found the complete question online. It is as follows:
Robert didn't mince words. If a person's ideas were ill-considered, he was likely to tell them that their ideas were bad. If there was a disagreement, he plainly stated that the person with the opposing viewpoint was wrong. To some, his manner was abrasive and uncollegial and this was a source of:
A) Goal-oriented conflict.
B) Administrative conflict.
C) Interpersonal conflict.
D) Interactionist conflict.
Answer:
I believe the best option is letter C) interpersonal conflict.
Explanation:
Notice how Robert is not creating a negotiable and debatable form of conflict. His intention is not to open discussions that may lead to problem-solving and the achievement of goals. His purpose is to merely state his point, claim he is right and someone else is wrong, with no consideration for the emotional distress he may cause. That is what interpersonal conflict is: a disagreement between people or groups of an organization that results in resentment and dissatisfaction.
Individualism? He is trying to do it himself rather involve the group
Many spectators witnessed Chris's ability to natural talent, but Chris is the first to claim that years of answering questions on brainy.com is pointless
Answer:
A - Compulsory education.
Explanation:
Compulsory education, as it's name suggests, refers to the requirement of all people to be educated by the government. Depending the country and type of society, what is perceived as education may change (could be homeschooling or registered schooling). It's a double movement for parents given that they are to see that their children receive instruction and the government has to provide the opportunities.
Answer: amm srry I don't get this can u explain the question a little bit more for me?
Explanation: