1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Jlenok [28]
3 years ago
5

common sense: pretend you are a colonist living in 1776. write a paragraph trying to convince other colonists to break away from

britain
Social Studies
1 answer:
LekaFEV [45]3 years ago
4 0
I say we should break away from Britain because they tax us too much. they are very unfair and they do whatever they want without consequences
You might be interested in
The fat intake of Americans a. has significantly declined, resulting in less obesity in the last 30 years. b. has declined as a
Yuliya22 [10]

Answer:

D

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
As baby Sanjay’s physical development improves, he is able to crawl around and explore his environment. This advances his cogn
Ksenya-84 [330]

Answer:

This example shows that the three areas of development D. overlap and interact.

Explanation:

As we can conclude from the situation described, baby Sanjay is not developing one area at a time. At the same time his motor skills are increasing, and because of that increase, he has experiences that improve his  cognitive and social/emotional development. He experiences anger while having an object taken away from his hands, as was described, which is an overlap of areas - more than one thing taking place and being processed simultaneously.

8 0
3 years ago
In recent years, psychologists have identified potential differences in the brain anatomy of gay men and their straight counterp
Ronch [10]

Answer:

Biological

Explanation:

The statements in the given question aims at studying the brains of the two genders therefore, the finding supports the " biological " perspective in psychology.

The biological perspective of psychology involves the study of the psychological issues of the different lives by examining the brain , nervous system or the genetics.

8 0
3 years ago
What is securalism? ​
sineoko [7]

I've heard individuals say things like, "You have to be secular," "I am secular," etc. even in academic contexts. Then there are some who despise secularism as the ruin of this nation. Secularism is viewed as a moral value by the pro-Secularism camp. According to the anti-Secilarim camp, it is equivalent to minoritarianism.

Both parties are mistaken and misinformed.

First and foremost, we need to understand that secularism is NOT for INDIVIDUALS. For the SYSTEM, that is.

Since secularism and religious freedom are mutually exclusive, no constitution that protects religious freedom can also impose secularism on its citizens. A separation from religion is secularism. It is the system, not the individual, that is required to dissociate.

The term "System" designates the complete administrative framework, including each of its constituent and contributing parts. The System includes everything that has to do with administration, formulation and application of policy, and law and justice. These must all be unbiased toward religion. The secular discipline also applies to the political organizations that take part in the process of electing the legislative bodies. Therefore, when a political party makes the claim that it is "secular," it is attempting the age-old ruse of constructing a virtue out of a need. It cannot be anything but secular. Similar to this, a government cannot avoid being secular. The courts, bureaucracy, and legislature all operate similarly. When we refer to ourselves as a "secular nation," we mean this.

Being Secular entails being cut off from Religion. This is a requirement of the Government, not of the people who make up the Government. The same is true of the other institutions that make up the democratic system. Secularism is an institution's character, not the personality of its employees. For instance, the Prime Minister must maintain his secularity while doing his official duties, but not in his personal life. Although the members who make up a political party are allowed to follow their faith, the essence of the organization's operations must be secular. Most individuals are unaware of this.

Secularism, as a constitutional ideal, is, nevertheless, consistently violated by the political and administrative establishments, both in letter and in spirit. A secular government cannot use its policies and programs to favor or disparage any religion. However, we see that governments, both at the federal level and at the state level, flagrantly break this cardinal rule by enacting religiously-specific social assistance programs that favor certain people while excluding others. Other fundamental protections, such equality and the prohibition of discrimination based on race, religion, or other factors, are also infringed as a result. This flagrant constitutional breach is not questioned or opposed.

The canvassing of votes in the name of religion is expressly prohibited. This is what the law says:

<em>"Section 123(3) of the Act* prohibits canvassing by an electoral candidate to woo voters in the name of race, caste, religion, community and language. It also prohibits usage of religious symbols or national symbols or flag for canvassing purposes. Usage of the aforesaid are considered to be corrupt practices. The electoral candidates cannot promise any public policy which they propose to implement on being successful."</em>

<em />

[*The 'Act' refers to the Representation of the People Act 1951]

Despite the fact that this is the law, the reality during election season is the complete reverse. Why doesn't anyone challenge it? Why doesn't anyone care about it? Every day we chant hymns to secularism, yet when it comes to actual practice, we disrespect it in spirit and soul. That is the major flaw in our democratic system.

Secularism itself is not the bad guy; its improper use is.

Thank you,

Eddie

5 0
1 year ago
Read 2 more answers
Which supreme court case set a precedent that allowed the courts to apply a balancing test in free speech cases?
marishachu [46]
It was Schenck v United States
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • He term disidentify in the area of stereotype threat refers to the idea of __________.
    6·1 answer
  • While watching a basketball game on television, Ryan typically leaves the room during commercial breaks and returns only when th
    12·1 answer
  • The expressed congregational power to regulate commerce implies that Congress may _______.
    9·2 answers
  • Our inability to fall asleep early as we had planned, is most likely a reflection of:
    11·1 answer
  • What did greeks contribute to the history of the western civilization
    9·2 answers
  • What part of the Constitution mandated the census?
    11·1 answer
  • How institutions, such as the government, may help to maintain the privileges of some groups is a topic of interest for
    11·1 answer
  • What is Socialization? Why is it important in sociology?
    11·2 answers
  • Why is the St. Lawrence Seaway important?
    14·2 answers
  • Which of the following is a reason digital channels can have more media richness than the media richness theory proposes? Group
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!