We will solve the problem for both cases:
Case 1:
If the amount increases by 7% we have the number for which we are going to multiply is given by:
Case 2:
If the amount decreases by 7% we have the number for which we are going to multiply is given by:
Answer:
single multiplier you would use for each case is:
x = 1.07 (increase)
x = 0.93 (decrease)
Answer:
5
0.1
10
10
Step-by-step explanation:
|actual temp - estimate| = |50 - 45| = |5| = 5
5/50 = 0.1
0.1 × 100 = 10
10
The thousands is the answer and you spelled does wrong
Answer:
Following are the solution to this question:
Step-by-step explanation:
For this set, the correlation coefficient is = -0.015.
It shows that financial variables have trust issues. Once a price rises, the other one is decreasing the value of -0,015 shows, that there are several fewer associations in the set of data among x and y and between y values. This interaction also can range between -1 to 1, to 0 being completely unrelated. But you'd never be sure, in this situation, 0.015 is very similar to 0.
It means that your prediction is nothing better than just a wild choice. Its odds of an estimated value being relatively close to the actual result are therefore much smaller as the points are it's hardly the best match.
Answer:
they would get 3 1/2
Step-by-step explanation:
because if there's two friends and seven cookies one friend we get three and the other one will get three and they could split the other cookie in half so that each Friend can have three cookies and a half if they split
