Although the 1800s in the United States seems like it was limited in opportunity by today's standards, it was much easier to make a living during this time in US than it was in China.
Answer:
feel more effective.
Explanation:
In general sense, small groups are defined as group of people mostly three or a few more people, but not in large numbers (above twenty) who are together to achieve a common goal. For example, a group of talented guys, that forms a musical group for the purpose of realizing their musical or artistical dreams.
Some of the characteristics of small groups includes:
1. Shared identity
2. Results oriented approach
3. Interdependece
4. Competent team members
Hence, in comparison with the large groups, people in small groups tend to identify themselves with the core structures and goals of the group, there by less likely to take more than their equal share of available resources, which in turn makes them to FEEL MORE EFFECTIVE in general towards the success of the group.
Answer:
Relevant; comparison
Explanation:
The comparison question test (CQT) posits that guilty individuals react more strongly to Relevant questions, whereas innocent individuals react more strongly to comparison questions.
The comparison question test (CQT) is one of the several questioning technique used in polygraph test, it designed to make comparative responses to relevant question with those of control questions i.e control for the effect of generally threatening nature of relevant question.
Making use of CQT assumes that physiological measures while lying will be greater than physiological measure while telling the truth. An innocent individual who is telling the truth react to comparison questions more than relevant question because these questions are design to arouse the subject concern about their past truthiness
Answer:
it depends upon our coming up with the right explanation as one of the candidates
Explanation:
Inference to the best explanation is a term generally in logic or philosophy, which describes a form of inductive reasoning where by individuals draw from the premises about an incident to an explanation for that particular incident.
This explanation is often a claim or reason given, as to why the incident is the way it is. For example: in the occurrence of a particular phenomenon named to be A. Premises B provides the best explanation for A. Therefore, it is most likely that B is true, even though there is no certainty or guarantee of its truth.
Hence, a limitation of inferences to the best explanation is that, "it depends upon our coming up with the right explanation as one of the candidates."
I'm leaning towards false for both.
