The separating of recordkeeping from the custody of assets a limitation of an internal control system because:
- In example above, fraud could occur only if the two employees collude (agree to work together to commit fraud)
- Employee maintaining accounting records has no incentive to falsify records.
- Employee controlling asset will know if another person is maintaining records or not.
- The employee who controls/has access to an asset should not maintain that asset's accounting records.
<h3>
What is meant by Internal Control?</h3>
- Internal controls are the mechanisms, rules, and procedures implemented by a corporation to ensure the integrity of financial and accounting information, promote accountability, and stop fraud.
- Internal controls can help improve operational efficiency by improving the accuracy and timeliness of financial reporting, besides complying with laws and regulations and preventing employees from stealing assets or committing fraud.
To learn more about asset's accounting records: brainly.com/question/24012821
#SPJ4
The types of quasi-contractual terms with which employees view what they owe their employer and what their employer owes them are referred to as Contractual agreement.
What is Quasi-contract terms?
- When there is a dispute between the parties and there was no initial agreement between them, the court may construct an out-of-order contract. This contract has the obligation to prevent one party from unfairly benefiting at the expense of the other parties. This circumstance is known as a quasi-contract.
- A retroactive agreement between two parties with no prior contractual responsibilities is known as a quasi contract.
- A court enacts it to address a situation where one party gains something at the expense of the other.
- A retroactive agreement between two parties with no prior contractual responsibilities is known as a quasi contract. A court enacts it to address a situation where one party gains something at the expense of the other.
To know more about Quasi-contract visit:
brainly.com/question/27993061
#SPJ4
Answer:
Option A. Liable, because notice to Emmett is notice to Fridley.
Explanation:
The reason is that the principle is liable for the outcome of the Emmett actions in the principle's behalf. So it is clear that Fridley is liable. The agent have to work in the best interest of its principal which means that the failure to notify the additional tax liability to Fridley was part of agent's fiduciary duty. This means that the principle can sue its agent for the consequences of not placing the sufficient care to its principle.
The Fridley is also responsible because Emmett is acting as Fridley which means the notice to Emmett is actually notice to Fridley.
Answer:
E. summarizing
Explanation:
This is an effective listening skill, as Blake asked his manager to improve what he said, and he articulated key ideas, and he took key points from people doubling his work to improve accuracy and become a team.
The player being investigated
so correct option is E. summarizing
Answer:
FED raise the federal funds rate target by 0.5%
FED raise the federal fund rate target by 2%
Explanation:
Taylor Rule states that Federal Funds should raise rates when inflation rises. When Gross domestic products growth of a country is high and above potential level then FED should raise rates. When inflation rises by 1% above target level then federal funds should raise FED by 2%.
