Answer:
Jill cannot hold the manufacturer responsible for her injury.
Explanation:
The above question is incomplete as there are several answer options which are listed below;
• Jill can hold the manufacturer liable for her injury as long as Lexi was in the room when she got
• Jill can hold the manufacturer liable for her injury
• Jill cannot hold the manufacturer responsible for her injury
• Lexi can hold the manufacturer liable for Jill's injury.
The above answer - Jill cannot hold the manufacturer responsible for her injury, is true according to the rule of privity of contract. The rule states that a person who is not a party to a contract does not have right to sue or be sued and to enforce the obligations arising from the contract, unlike a person who is a party to the contract.
With regards to the above scenario, Lexi, who buys a food processor is the party to the contract here, hence can sue and be sued in case of any injury suffered by her, however, Jill whom food processor was loaned to, is the third party here, hence not covered by the rule of privity of contract.
Answer:
Variation in size, scope and buoyancy of demand in local markets is likely to affect growth opportunities. ... A business set up to exploit an identified market opportunity would be expected to have stronger growth orientation than one set up as a result of 'push' factors such as a lack of alternative opportunities.
The answer false because the objective of the resume is usualy one or two sentences long.
Answer:
$64,600
Explanation:
Given that
Variable costing net operating income last year = $1,03,000
Fixed manufacturing overhead costs = $38,400
The computation of net operating income is as shown below:-
= Variable cost - Overhead cost
= $1,03,000 - $38,400
= $64,600
So, from the above calculation we simply deduct Variable cost from Overhead cost.
