Answer:
Current issues in the framework by regarding fabricating costs as a period cost
Assembling overhead is evaluated bu increasing direct work with 300%. This estimation isn't exact and doesn't speak to how the genuine variable sub-costs that form the manufacturing overhead act for example machine related costs, arrangement work, getting and creation control, designing, bundling and sending. In spite of the fact that there could be a connection between the measure of direct work cost and the all out manufacturing overhead, this present strategy for estimation is dubious and ignores the real segments of manufacturing overhead.
Advantage of Product Cost
Increasingly exact impression of the inconstancy of the sources for example on the off chance that there are five factors, it is more precise than one.
Advantage of Period Cost
Treating manufacturing overhead as a period cost implies that it stays simpler to contrast Wilkerson's and a rival, given that contender likewise treats manufacturing overhead as a period cost for example it is simpler to analyze like-for-like
Answer:
Price of bonds = $1,389.73
Explanation:
<em>The value of the bond is the present value(PV) of the future cash receipts expected from the bond. The value is equal to present values of interest payment plus the redemption value (RV).
</em>
Value of Bond = PV of interest + PV of RV
The value of bond for Hillard can be worked out as follows:
Step 1
<em>Calculate the PV of interest payments
</em>
Semi annual interest payment
= 10% × 1,000 × 1/2 =50
PV of interest payment
A ×(1- (1+r)^(-n))/r
r- semi-annual yield = 5%/2 = 2.5%
n- 10× 2 = 20.
Note that the bonds now have 10 years to maturity because it was issued 2 years ago
PV on interest = 50 × (1-(1.025^(-20)/0.0425 = 779.45
Step 2
<em>PV of redemption Value
</em>
PV = $1,000 × (1.025)^(-20)
= 610.27
Step 3
<em>Price of bond
</em>
= 779.45+ 610.27 = $1,389.73
Price of bonds = $1,389.73
Answer:
Explanation:
30 - 21 = 9 years
r = 3% inflation
FV = 25,000
We know that FV = PV(1+r)^n
25,000 = PV(1+0.03)^9
PV = 25,000/ 1.3047731
PV = 19,160.42, this is how much it worth today
Answer:
1.
<u>Net income increases</u><em>. - </em>Ability to pay Dividends increases.
Dividends are paid from Retained Earnings which are derived from Net Income. If Net income increases therefore, so does the ability to pay Dividends.
<u>More profitable investment opportunities are available</u> - Decreases Ability to pay Dividends.
If there are more profitable opportunities for investment available, the business will invest in those opportunities. By doing so they will reduce the amount of cash that they have which is cash that could have been paid as dividends.
<u>The firm increases its debt ratio</u>. - Ability to pay Dividends Increase
As a result of the company borrowing more money, there will be more money left to pay out dividends so more dividends will be paid.
2. A. Despite the fact that Dernham Burnham Inc.'s earnings tend to fluctuate from year to year, the company most likely pays a predictable, stable dividend each year.
Companies like Dernham that aim to please investors usually adopt a predictable, stable dividend policy every year so that the investors will have more faith in them and be sure of earnings every year. This will give them a higher rating with the investors.
