The answer is b most definitely
I'm not positive of this answer but, I'm pretty sure it's 85,688 using common sense. The population would definitely be greater before the epidemic hit because, and infectious disease or anything like that would obviously cause the population to decrease. Therefore, B) is the most reasonable answer.
No rockyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
Answer: ![(-2, 5)](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%28-2%2C%205%29)
Step-by-step explanation:
The graphs are shown in the attached image.
The solution is where they intersect.