Yes here multiply takes place not divide
The right choice is: A <em>whole</em> number constant could have been <em>subtracted</em> from the <em>exponential</em> expression.
Let be an <em>exponential</em> function of the form
, where
and
are <em>real</em> numbers. A <em>horizontal</em> asymptote exists when
, which occurs for
.
For this function, the <em>horizontal</em> asymptote is represented by
and to change the value of the asymptote we must add the <em>parent</em> function by another <em>real</em> number (
), that is to say:
(1)
In this case, we must use
to obtain an horizontal asymptote of -3. Thus, the right choice is: A <em>whole</em> number constant could have been <em>subtracted</em> from the <em>exponential</em> expression.
To learn more on asymptotes, we kindly invite to check this verified question: brainly.com/question/8493280
Check the picture below, so the circle looks more or less like so, with a radius of 9.
![\textit{circumference of a circle}\\\\ C=2\pi r~~ \begin{cases} r=radius\\[-0.5em] \hrulefill\\ r=9 \end{cases}\implies C=2\pi (9)\implies C\approx 57](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Ctextit%7Bcircumference%20of%20a%20circle%7D%5C%5C%5C%5C%20C%3D2%5Cpi%20r~~%20%5Cbegin%7Bcases%7D%20r%3Dradius%5C%5C%5B-0.5em%5D%20%5Chrulefill%5C%5C%20r%3D9%20%5Cend%7Bcases%7D%5Cimplies%20C%3D2%5Cpi%20%289%29%5Cimplies%20C%5Capprox%2057)