Answer:
George Washington was a man of extraordinary charisma and talent for leadership. The populace admired and respected him; his fellow soliders and officials did, too; he had dealings with outstanding people of his time who stood higher than he did intellectually level. Nevertheless, he was the leader.
According to a paper by reverend Richard C. Stazesky for the George Washington Club (2000) in Delaware , Washington´s leadership style shows the following characteristics:
- he had a vision of the cause that comprised ideas and goals that would not be changed no matter the circumstances;
- he was skillful in designing and creating an organizational culture that made possible the achievement of the leader´s vision and ideas;
- he was successful in gaining others for the cause by persuading them and by instilling in them his ideas, beliefs and values of his vision.
- as any other successful leader, he effectively combined in himself different roles to be played for the cause.
Explanation:
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Operations Management is an area of management that deals with processes and functions that manufacture goods and renders services to the end user while taking care of efficiency, effectiveness, and productivity.
OM primarily increase value-added during the transformation process.
OM information systems help to determine what resources will be needed
, when each resource will be needed and who will perform the work.
It's main objective is to utilize resources of the organization in the best possible manner.
It also considers many interrelated activities, such as forecasting, capacity planning, scheduling, managing inventories, assuring quality, motivating employees, deciding where to locate facilities, and more.
The given statement is true.
1) The intolerable acts directly led to the American Revolutionary war since they were a direct response to the Boston tea party. 2) The supremacy clause was included so as to increase the power of the federal government because it was seen that giving states too much power was not a great idea
Answer:
In the first past the post system, as the name implies, the party or candidate winning the a plurality of votes obtains all the political seats being contested.
For example, suppose we have three parties, and 20 seats being contested in a fictional election. The results are:
Red party - 60%
Green party - 30%
Blue party - 10%
Under a first past the post system, the Red Party would obtain all the 20 seats.
Under a proportional system, on the other hand, each party or candidate gets a proportional amount of seats corresponding to the percentage of the votes.
For example, if the number of seats contested is 20, and we obtain the same results as above, the number of seats for each party (in bold) would be:
Red party - 60% - 12 seats
Green party - 30% - 6 seats
Blue party - 10% - 2 seats
