<span>The phrase used in the article, a more equitable distribution of income, is meant to convey the idea that income should be more fairly distributed through everyone in all classes in the country. The basic idea is there should not be such huge gaps between the top and bottom income tiers.</span>
The correct option is B
<u>Explanation:</u>
In an economy, planned investment spending is always equal to planned saving. If actual saving falls short of (exceeds) planned saving, then actual investment falls short of (exceeds) planned investment.
That is the other part of the saving paradox. If an economy produces too much, such that saving is greater than planned investment, inventory will build up, giving signal to producers to reduce output, to restore equilibrium. Such investment scheme is suitable only to communist countries. Keynes has another investment theory in his liquidity story. But investment theories are equally a posterior.
Therefore, Option B is correct
Answer;
We have no achieved "equal justice for all" examples. women, minorities such as blacks, gays
Explanation;
-The basic law of the state is the Standard of Justice. The state is, therefore, no more than a voluntary, meritocratic public service, headed by an elected policy directorate.
-One of the purpose of government is to establish justice; The law, in both its consent and its administration, must be reasonable, fair, and impartial. Those standards of justice have not always been met in this country.
-The belief in equality before the law is called legal egalitarianism. Article 7 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) states that; All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law.
Answer:
a) The warrant are Dilutive
b) Basic EPS $2.62
c) Diluteed EPS = $2.31
Explanation:
a) The warrants are dilute because the cost of exercising the rights is lover than the market price
b) Basic Eps = Total Earning/Share Outstanding = $262,000/100,000 = $2.62
c) Diluted Eps = Earnings/(Shares outstanding+potential shares)
= $262,000/(100,000+13,500) = $2.31
