Answer:
In an office, every employee has an absolute and comparative advantage depending on the type of work he/she is best at.
In Hector's office, the employee Sasha worked as a computer designer and was excellent in her work. This means that the employee Sasha had an absolute and comparative advantage as she was efficient in her work and hence, there was no opportunity cost of her side of work.
The employee, Maurice was best in logo designing. Hence, he had a absolute and comparative advantage as he was good in logo designing and their was no other opportunity cost for his work.
When there's a telephone bomb threat, it's important to keep the caller on the line as long as possible.
<h3>What is a threat?</h3>
A threat simply means a statement of intention to causes harm or injury to another person.
In the event of a telephone bomb threat, it is important to keep the caller on the line as long as possible.
Also, be polite and show interest to keep talking to the person and then signal a note to other staffs to contact the appropriate authority.
Learn more about threats on:
brainly.com/question/25758530
Answer:John at IBM America is likely to exhibit social loafing.
Explanation:
According to research, a Collectivistic culture as seen in countries like China, Korea, and Japan, is one that characterized by group prioritization above personal interest while Individualistic culture as seen in countries like United States is one characterized by individual's needs before group goals.
Also, Social loafing is a situation where an individual put less effort when working as a group to perform a task to achieve a goal, but may give his best when working solely on the project.
From the definitions above, its likely that an individual with a social loafing mindset may come from an individualistic culture as seen in a country like United States. Therefore, we can infer that John at IBM America is likely to exhibit social loafing.
The correct answer here would be D.
The Kellogg-Briand Pact in an international agreement signed by 64 nations which through it renounced war and agreed not to use it to solve disputes. The disputes were to be settled peacefully. It was signed in 1928 and had little effect, mainly because the League of Nations was enable to enforce it due to lack of authority and the absence of US. So the correct answer is D.
