Since the perimeter must not exceed 291.
Let the third side be x.
x + 87 + 64 < 291
x + 151 < 291.
x < 291 -151.
x < 140. (First)
But for a triangle there is what is called the Triangle Inequality Theorem. That given the two sides of a tringle, the third side of the triangle must greater than the positive difference between the two sides and less than the sum of the two sides.
So for this case. 87 and 64.
x > ( 87 - 64). x > 23.
x < (87 + 64) x < 151. Combine both inequalities.
23 < x < 151 (second).
Combining First and second. Both must be satisfied.
So we have a more accurate answer as:
23 < x < 140. x is greater than 23 and x is less than 140.
x could be 24, 25, 26, 27, ......, 139. cm.
I hope this helps.
The best arrangement can be
- 3 rows and 4balls each row
So
- Length of one row=1.8(4)=7.2cm
- Width=1.8(3)=5.4cm
- Height=1.8(2)=3.6cm
So
TSA
- 2(LB+BH+LH)
- 2(5.4(7.2)+(7.2)(3.6)+3.6(5.4))
- 2(84.24)
- 168.48cm²
Total cost
The solution for the problem is:
I will first get the first five terms so that I could easily locate the third term of this problem:So, substituting the values:
T(1) = 1^2 = 1T(2) = 2^2 = 4T(3) = 3^2 = 9T(4) = 4^2 = 16T(5) = 5^2 =25
So the third terms is T(3) = 3^2 = 9
9514 1404 393
Answer:
see attached
Step-by-step explanation:
Most of this exercise is looking at different ways to identify the slope of the line. The first attachment shows the corresponding "run" (horizontal change) and "rise" (vertical change) between the marked points.
In your diagram, these values (run=1, rise=-3) are filled in 3 places. At the top, the changes are described in words. On the left, they are described as "rise" and "run" with numbers. At the bottom left, these same numbers are described by ∆y and ∆x.
The calculation at the right shows the differences between y (numerator) and x (denominator) coordinates. This is how you compute the slope from the coordinates of two points.
If you draw a line through the two points, you find it intersects the y-axis at y=4. This is the y-intercept that gets filled in at the bottom. (The y-intercept here is 1 left and 3 up from the point (1, 1).)
8t+32 is one expression equivalent to that.
