The three concerns that the residents of this area might be:
1) <span>The cost of not moving forward is extremely high, so they opposed the plan, as they think it would affect US economy
2) </span><span>Nuclear waste disposal capability is an environmental imperative, so their environment would be polluted by very radioactive materials.
3) </span>Demand for new nuclear plants also demands disposal capability which supports national security but again, their site will be no longer for them. But unfortunately, <span>Extensive studies consistently show Yucca Mountain to be a sound site for nuclear waste disposal so the plan can't be abolished.
Hope this helps!</span>
1) 1.8 micrograms(least)
2) 1.8 grams
3) 1.8 kilograms(greatest)
Answer:
18.84 g of silver.
Explanation:
We'll begin by calculating the number atoms present in 5.59 g of sulphur. This can be obtained as follow:
From Avogadro's hypothesis,
1 mole of sulphur contains 6.02×10²³ atoms.
1 mole of sulphur = 32 g
Thus,
32 g of sulphur contains 6.02×10²³ atoms.
Therefore, 5.59 g of sulphur will contain = (5.59 × 6.02×10²³) / 32 = 1.05×10²³ atoms.
From the calculations made above, 5.59 g of sulphur contains 1.05×10²³ atoms.
Finally, we shall determine the mass of silver that contains 1.05×10²³ atoms.
This is illustrated below:
1 mole of silver = 6.02×10²³ atoms.
1 mole of silver = 108 g
108 g of silver contains 6.02×10²³ atoms.
Therefore, Xg of silver will contain 1.05×10²³ atoms i.e
Xg of silver = (108 × 1.05×10²³)/6.02×10²³
Xg of silver = 18.84 g
Thus, 18.84 g of silver contains the same number of atoms (i.e 1.05×10²³ atoms) as 5.59 g of sulfur
Answer:
A calorimeter is an apparatus for measuring the amount of heat involved in a chemical reaction or other process.
