Answer:Today, we're introducing three revolutionary products. The first one is a widescreen iPod with touch controls. The second is a revolutionary mobile phone. And the third is a breakthrough Internet communications device. So, three things: a widescreen iPod with touch controls, a revolutionary mobile phone, and a breakthrough Internet communications device. An iPod, a phone, and an Internet communicator. An iPod, a phone...are you getting it? These are not three separate devices. This is one device. And we are calling it iPhone. Today, Apple is going to reinvent the phone.
Late last year, former Apple engineer Andy Grignon, who was in charge of the radios on the original iPhone, gave behind-the-scenes look at how Apple patched together demos for the introduction, with Steve Jobs showing off developmental devices full of buggy software and hardware issues. The iPhone team knew that everything had to go just right for the live iPhone demos to succeed, and they did, turning the smartphone industry on its head even as Apple continue to scramble to finish work on the iPhone.
Apple had actually been interested first in developing a tablet known as "Safari Pad", but as noted by a number of sources including Steve Jobs himself, the company shifted gears once it became clear how revolutionary the multi-touch interface developed for the tablet could be for a smartphone. Apple's tablet wouldn't surface until the launch of the iPad in 2010, three years after the introduction of the iPhone.
Seven years after the famous Macworld 2007 keynote, the iPhone has seen significant enhancements in every area, but the original iPhone remains recognizable as Apple has maintained the overall look of a sleek design with a larger touchscreen and a single round home button on the face of the device.
Explanation:
Answer:
The factors to consider when building a solution for optical workflow for car accident are the type of claim to be modelled, also to examine the level of automation in vehicles.
Some of the software solutions that meet the requirements are the A1 Tracker which is very effective to the enterprise business and small business working with insurance. we also have the Mutual expert, Ninja Quote.
Explanation:
Solution
In suggesting an optical workflow for the car accident claim process it is of importance to understand the following factors such as, the type of claim to be modelled, it will be determined by the policy that the clients have for their cars. this will assist in classifying the workflow and giving a clear path of the design.
The number of expected claims is also a very important factor that should be added in the design. Another important factor to examine the level of automation of the vehicles, this can be very useful in collecting the accident data in a more efficient way and also making it simple to design the model.
Presently there are several workflow softwares in the insurance that have encouraged a great deal and have made the workflow in the insurance companies more greater.
Some of the soft wares are the A1 Tracker which are very effective and efficient in are highly applicable to the enterprise business and small business working with insurance, the software is convenient in monitoring the work progress in the company.
The other soft wares that have been quite useful in the industry for example the Insly, ISI enterprise, Mutual expert, Ninja Quoter among others. These software are some of the best soft wares available in the market that have met the workflow requirement in the insurance sector.
There are several things you can look for on a website to help you figure out if the information is reliable. The first thing you should evaluate is the audience that the website is intended for. Is it intended for academics? School children? The general public?
The next thing you should look at is the author of the website. Is the author identified? Is the author an expert in their field? Can you establish the author's credibility? Is the author affiliated to an academic institution or credible organisation?
Look at the accuracy of the website. Check for spelling errors, proper grammar, and well-written text. Are there any sources cited? Are those sources credible?
You should also check to see when the information was published. Is the information up to date? Are all of the links up to date and functioning?
There is one last thing you can look at, and this is the domain of the website. Domains like .edu and .gov are more credible than .com or .net domains.
If we are talking about light that’s an whole different subject
