It should be B, but I’m not too educated on Egypt’s history
Answer:
Alcohol withdrawal syndrome
Explanation:
The question actually tells us that Heather is having physical withdrawal symptoms after she stopped drinking.
In particular, Alcohol withdrawal syndrome includes various symptoms such like <u>headache, nausea, vomiting, insomnia, shaking hands, trembling and sweating.</u> As time passes <u>hallucinations</u> can also happen (after 24 hours) and the symptoms can continue getting worse: between 48 to 72 hours, <u>delirium tremens </u>can take place (this refers to vivid hallucinations) but it can also include heavy sweating and a rapid heart beat.
We can see that the symptoms Heather has after 24 hours without having alcohol are some from the alcohol withdrawal syndrome (trembling, vivid dreams, sweating, rapid heart rate, nausea, among others).
Answer:
Nancy's lapse in memory is due to substance abuse
Explanation:
While Amnesia will result from damage to a brain structure in the limbic system, responsible for emotions and memories, often known as neurological amnesia.
Nancy has rather a self-caused forgetting which is enabled by
use of drugs like benzodiazepines or sedatives, alcohol, marijuana often causes forgetting effects yet amnesia is a disorder that generally speaking arises as a result of a brain injury or a severe mental health conditions
Today we know that certain substance called beta-blockers help destabilize painful or fearful memories that ofter are hard to forget.
Persons that are suffering in a relationship can have certain periods where they solve substance abuse and taking alcohol with drugs often leads to a substance called metyrapone that blocks the synthesis of the cortisol.
The stress hormone cortisol is suppressed allowing the person to "forget those painful moments".
Since many people solve to drugs and their negative effects are severe, by no means, this will be a solution.
It would be always advised to seek help and gain better insight to deal with circumstances cleverly.
False. The Marshall Court did not strengthen Federalism in the case of Gibbons v Ogden rather, it collapsed the foundation of such because monopoly in commerce activities was so rampant during those days. The case was an exclusive grant of 20 years of navigation privileges on all the waters under the US jurisdiction. It had paved the way for businessmen to take advantage of the situation.
