1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
jasenka [17]
3 years ago
12

Most courts: A) follow the requirements for promissory estoppel set forth in the "Restatement (Second) of Contracts" because the

"Restatement" is the law. B) follow the requirements for promissory estoppel set forth in the "Restatement (Second) of Contracts" despite the fact that the "Restatement" does not carry the force of law. C) do not follow the requirements for promissory estoppel set forth in the "Restatement (Second) of Contracts" despite the fact that the "Restatement" carries the force of law. D) none of the above.
Law
1 answer:
asambeis [7]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

A

Explanation:

The Restatement(Second) of Contracts is a general principles of contract common law.

Promissory Estoppel is a legal principle in contract law that stops a person on breaking the promise.

Courts forr promissory Estoppel mentioned in Restatement(Second) of Contracts because "Restatement" is the law and is frequently referred to.

You might be interested in
66 points ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Artyom0805 [142]

The thing which is the property, services, or money that a contract offeror provides to the offeree is a consideration.

<h3>What do you mean by a contract?</h3>

A contract refers to the enforceable agreement that defines and governs mutual rights and obligations among parties.

Consideration refers to anything of value that is given or promised such as money, property, services, or forbearance to induce another to enter into the contract.

Therefore, C is the correct option.

Learn more about the Contract here:

brainly.com/question/2669219

#SPJ1

7 0
2 years ago
Cases heard by the Supreme Court are named for the two or more parties who oppose each other. A party can be either an individua
Oxana [17]

Answer:

Cherokee Nation v. Georgia.

Explanation:

The 1831 Supreme Court case of the Cherokee Nation v. Georgia was a court ruling between the Cherokee Nation, the petitioners, against the state of Georgia, the respondent.

In this court case, the Cherokees filed a complaint against the State of Georgia, asking if the state has any jurisdiction to impose laws on the Nation. This was because the state has promised Cherokee lands to Georgian settlers if they settle in the state. The court decided that since the Cherokees are a dependent nation, it cannot make any decision as it has no jurisdiction over the case. Thus, this means that the Cherokee Nation cannot have any legal recourse to stop the state from taking their lands. This case was then followed up by the 1832 Worcester v. Georgia ruling where the court ruled in favor of the Cherokee people.

Thus, the correct answer is Cherokee Nation v. Georgia.

3 0
3 years ago
A couple alter the number on a lottery ticket to match the previous night's winning
Crank
Counterfeiting or forgery
3 0
3 years ago
If a truck is ahead in the left lane with a right turn signal on, stay away from its ___________ side.
Mademuasel [1]
I think the right side?
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A man’s wife had an incurable and very painful disease. To put her out of her misery, he killed her.
Burka [1]
Answer: yes

explanation: if she was in so much pain, then she could’ve killed herself instead. Since it didn’t state if the man asked for her permission to kill her, then it was probably his choice
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is a presentence report?​
    6·1 answer
  • Which statement listed below is the best example of mortgage fraud?
    8·1 answer
  • Walter plays an important role in the correctional system of the United States. He works at a prison, where his primary duty is
    8·1 answer
  • Most warning signs are ____.
    9·2 answers
  • Minh-Tam is a lawyer whose client told her he was guilty. The client is insistent on testifying, but Minh-Tam believes she will
    14·1 answer
  • Who proposed 30 different suggestions for why crime remained high in some areas even when there was high population turn-over?
    14·1 answer
  • How does sexual reproduction reduces the risk of genetic disease​
    15·1 answer
  • The Great Compromise called for representation in the House of Representatives to be based on
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following is TRUE regarding the test drive portion of obtaining
    9·1 answer
  • Permitting rental agencies to refuse to rent apartments to families with children would violate what kind of due process?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!