1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
AURORKA [14]
3 years ago
12

Using V =iwh what is an expression for the volume of the following prism​

Mathematics
1 answer:
vampirchik [111]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

we know that

The volume of the prism is equal to

V=L*W*H

where

L is the length side of the base of the prism

W is the width side of the base of the prism

H is the height of the prism

In this problem we have

L=\frac{d-2}{3d-9}=\frac{d-2}{3(d-3)}

W=\frac{4}{d-4}

H=\frac{2d-6}{2d-4}=\frac{2(d-3)}{2(d-2)}=\frac{(d-3)}{(d-2)}

Substitute the values in the formula

V=\frac{d-2}{3(d-3)}*\frac{4}{d-4}*\frac{(d-3)}{(d-2)}=\frac{4}{3(d-4)}=\frac{4}{3d-12}

therefore

the answer is the option

4/3d-12

Step-by-step explanation:

You might be interested in
Determine the sign of each product and place it in the correct category​
kicyunya [14]

Answer:

sorry i had too

Step-by-step explanation:

someone passed this to me) 90% of people marry there 7th grade love. since u have read this, u will be told good news tonight. if u don't pass this on nine comments your worst week starts now this isn't fake. apparently if u copy and paste this on ten comments in the next ten minutes you will have the best day of your life tomorrow. you will either get kissed or asked out in the next 53 minutes someone will say i love you

7 0
3 years ago
6x+2(x+4)<2x+20 solve for inequality
8_murik_8 [283]

The problem to solve is:

6x+2(x+4)‹2x+20

First, let's work on the left hand side of your inequality, the 6x+2(x+4)

This means, for instance, to see if it can be simplified at all.

Multiply x and 6

Multiply x and 1

The x just gets copied along.

The answer is x

x

6*x evaluates to 6x

x+4 evaluates to x+4

Multiply 2 by x+4

we multiply 2 by each term in x+4 term by term.

This is the distributive property of multiplication.

Multiply 2 and x

Multiply 1 and x

The x just gets copied along.

x

2 × x = 2x

Multiply 2 and 4

1

2 × 4 = 8

2*(x+4) evaluates to 2x+8

6x + 2x = 8x

The answer is 8x+8

6*x+2*(x+4) evaluates to 8x+8

So, all-in-all, the left hand side of your inequality can be written as: 8x+8

Now, let's work on the right hand side of your inequality, the 2x+20

Multiply x and 2

Multiply x and 1

The x just gets copied along.

The answer is x

x

2*x evaluates to 2x

2*x+20 evaluates to 2x+20

The right hand side of your inequality can be written as: 2x+20

So with these (any) simplifications, the inequality we'll set out to solve is:

8x+8 ‹ 2x+20

Move the 8 to the right hand side by subtracting 8 from both sides, like this:

From the left hand side:

8 - 8 = 0

The answer is 8x

From the right hand side:

20 - 8 = 12

The answer is 12+2x

Now, the inequality reads:

8x ‹ 12+2x

Move the 2x to the left hand side by subtracting 2x from both sides, like this:

From the left hand side:

8x - 2x = 6x

The answer is 6x

From the right hand side:

2x - 2x = 0

The answer is 12

Now, the inequality reads:

6x ‹ 12

To isolate the x, we have to divide both sides of the inequality by the other "stuff" (variables or coefficients)

around the x on the left side of the inequality.

The last step is to divide both sides of the inequality by 6 like this:

To divide x by 1

The x just gets copied along in the numerator.

The answer is x

6x ÷ 6 = x

12 ÷ 6 = 2

The solution to your inequality is:

x ‹ 2

So, your solution is:

x must be less than 2The problem to solve is:

6x+2(x+4)‹2x+20

First, let's work on the left hand side of your inequality, the 6x+2(x+4)

This means, for instance, to see if it can be simplified at all.

Multiply x and 6

Multiply x and 1

The x just gets copied along.

The answer is x

x

6*x evaluates to 6x

x+4 evaluates to x+4

Multiply 2 by x+4

we multiply 2 by each term in x+4 term by term.

This is the distributive property of multiplication.

Multiply 2 and x

Multiply 1 and x

The x just gets copied along.

x

2 × x = 2x

Multiply 2 and 4

1

2 × 4 = 8

2*(x+4) evaluates to 2x+8

6x + 2x = 8x

The answer is 8x+8

6*x+2*(x+4) evaluates to 8x+8

So, all-in-all, the left hand side of your inequality can be written as: 8x+8

Now, let's work on the right hand side of your inequality, the 2x+20

Multiply x and 2

Multiply x and 1

The x just gets copied along.

The answer is x

x

2*x evaluates to 2x

2*x+20 evaluates to 2x+20

The right hand side of your inequality can be written as: 2x+20

So with these (any) simplifications, the inequality we'll set out to solve is:

8x+8 ‹ 2x+20

Move the 8 to the right hand side by subtracting 8 from both sides, like this:

From the left hand side:

8 - 8 = 0

The answer is 8x

From the right hand side:

20 - 8 = 12

The answer is 12+2x

Now, the inequality reads:

8x ‹ 12+2x

Move the 2x to the left hand side by subtracting 2x from both sides, like this:

From the left hand side:

8x - 2x = 6x

The answer is 6x

From the right hand side:

2x - 2x = 0

The answer is 12

Now, the inequality reads:

6x ‹ 12

To isolate the x, we have to divide both sides of the inequality by the other "stuff" (variables or coefficients)

around the x on the left side of the inequality.

The last step is to divide both sides of the inequality by 6 like this:

To divide x by 1

The x just gets copied along in the numerator.

The answer is x

6x ÷ 6 = x

12 ÷ 6 = 2

The solution to your inequality is:

x ‹ 2

So, your solution is:

x must be less than 2

7 0
3 years ago
On 1 May 2012, the cost of 5 grams of gold was 14 000 rupees.
navik [9.2K]

Answer:

51,800 rupees

Step-by-step explanation:

Cost of 5 grams of gold on 1 May 2012 = 14 000 rupees.

The cost of gold decreased by 7.5% from 1 May 2012 to 1 May 2013

Cost of 5 grams of gold on 1 May 2013 = 14,000 - 7.5% of 14,000

= 14,000 - 0.075 × 14,000

= 14,000 - 1,050

= 12,950 rupees

Work out the cost of 20 grams of gold on 1 May 2013

Since, there are four 5 grams of gold in 20 grams of gold

Therefore,

Cost of 20 grams of gold on 1 May 2013 = 12,950 rupees × 4

= 51,800 rupees

4 0
3 years ago
The present age of Madison’s mother is 3 times that of Madison. After 614 years, the sum of their age will be 5334 years. Find t
Neporo4naja [7]

The present age of Madison is <u>1027 years</u> and that of his mother is <u>3080 years</u> (rounded off to nearest whole numbers), solved using the linear equation in one variable: <u>(x + 614) + (3x + 614) = 5334</u>, where x represents the present age of Madison.

<h3>What are linear equations in one variable?</h3>

Linear equations in one variable are the linear relationship between two algebraic expressions not involving more than one variable throughout the equation.

<h3>How to solve the question?</h3>

In the question, we are informed that the present age of Maison's mother is 3 times that of Madison. After 614 years, the sum of their age will be 5334 years.

We are asked to determine their present ages.


We assume the present age of Madison to be x years.

Therefore, the present age of Madison's mother = 3x years {3 times that of Madison}.

Now, after 614 years, both of their ages will increase by 614 years.

Therefore, age of Madison after 614 years = x + 614 {Present + 614}.

Age of Madison's mother = 3x + 614 {Present + 614}.

We are given that after 614 years, the sum of their ages will be 5334.

This can be represented by the linear equation in one variable:

(x + 614) + (3x + 614) = 5334

This linear equation in one variable can be simplified and solved in the following way:

or, 4x + 1228 = 5334 {Simplifying},

or, 4x + 1228 - 1228 = 5334 - 1228 {Subtracting 1228 from both sides}

or, 4x = 4106 {Simplifying}

or, 4x/4 = 4106/4 {Dividing both sides by 4},

or, x = 1026.5 {Simplifying}.

Therefore, the present age of Madison = x = 1026.5 = 1027 years (nearest whole number).

The present age of Madison's mother = 3x = 3*1026.5 = 3079.5 = 3080 years (nearest whole number).

Learn more about linear equations in one variable at

brainly.com/question/185288

#SPJ2

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A train in Japan can travel 813.5 miles in 5 hours <br><br> Find the unit rate in miles per hour
Olegator [25]

Answer: Train in Japan travels 162.7 miles per hour

Step-by-step explanation:

813.5/5

162.7

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • If 5 is transformed into 11 and 12 is transformed into 25, then what does 15 become
    13·1 answer
  • How would you write 6 x 6 x 6 x 6 as an exponential expression?<br> OA. 6x4<br> OB. 6x4<br> OC. 614
    11·1 answer
  • A ball is thrown into the air with an upward velocity of 36 ft/s. Its height h in feet after t seconds is given by the function
    5·1 answer
  • 13) through: (2, -3), parallel to y = -x + 4
    9·1 answer
  • I need to show work help meee
    5·1 answer
  • State the property that justifies the statement: if 3x+4=10, then 3x=6
    9·2 answers
  • Select all that are equeveltnet to 8:6<br> 4:3<br> 6:8<br> 16:12<br> 10:8<br> 7:5
    8·2 answers
  • What is the angle of Z?
    15·1 answer
  • If a 8.5 sized shoe is reduced by 1/2 what will the new shoe size be?
    14·1 answer
  • What segment is the altitude to side AC?<br><br><br><br> Segment CR<br> Segment BT<br> Segment BL
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!